dennisthiessenandClaude Opus 5
a0ec2fedb5
Scout run 2026-09-04 (36 companies, 778 eligible) plus the NVIDIA package it surfaced, and the tooling and policy fixes found along the way. Application - NVIDIA Senior DevOps Engineer, Zurich (JR2024256): submitted 2026-09-05. Evidence Fit 64/100 Stretch, hard gate FAIL x2, channel Weak. Sent on an explicit user override with the working model unresolved, so hybrid-vs-onsite is a live screening topic. 2pp resume + 1pp cover letter, both validators PASS, 0 boxes, 0 Tier 1 findings open. Policy - Drop the 7 Core / 2 Adjacent / 1 Stretch cohort caps. They had no derivation and were overridden whenever they bound, and the cohort was confounded: it tested fit class while holding channel constant at Weak across all six applications. Keep the recording, drop the rationing. - Channel replaces the slot budget as the rationed variable: no application goes out cold when a named contact is published and reachable. - Propagated through shared_ops, session_file_template, cohort_tracker (counts, never counts-against-a-target) and application_cohort.json. Tool fixes - fetch_workday emitted 404 URLs for every Workday company (NVIDIA, Novartis, Equinor): externalPath is site-relative and needs the locale + site prefix. 6/6 short-form 404, 3/3 long-form 200. 773 dead links repaired across 42 archived reports. - find_decision_url silently de-linked decisions on two boards, which is why ruled-out roles kept resurfacing as undecided. RUAG rotates its UUID on repost; BIS migrated its vacancy URL scheme, orphaning 5 decisions including a live application. Fixed as a two-tier match, not a slug key -- slugs collide (two live RUAG reqs shared one). Knowledge base - claims.json: add Bash / shell scripting, the third canonical gap of this shape after Ansible and Linux administration. - bundle_data_platform: BS-4 was framed as a delivered observability stack over what claims.json calls a proof of concept -- the defect the 2026-08-21 sweep was told to look for. - CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md: correct the RUAG Data Lakehouse shortlist claim, which the JD does not support and which both files still asserted. - resume_template: comment-guard the missing babel/ngerman language block. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QFb8tTCig5r1KzkQiNXcYt
78 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
78 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
# Session File Template
|
|
|
|
Every JD gets `output/<Folder>/session_<name>.md`.
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Session: [Company] — [Role]
|
|
|
|
## JD Integrity
|
|
- File/source:
|
|
- Retrieval method and date:
|
|
- Verbatim posting: YES/NO
|
|
- Posting status:
|
|
|
|
## Application Decision
|
|
- Audience profile: International Tech / Swiss-DACH / Employer-specific
|
|
- Evidence Fit: [0-100]
|
|
- Fit class: Core / Adjacent / Stretch
|
|
- Hard gate: PASS / FAIL — [reason]
|
|
- Channel Strength: Strong / Moderate / Weak
|
|
- Channel plan: [referral/recruiter/hiring-team/cold]
|
|
- Named contact published? YES/NO -- [who, and whether contacted] (no slot quotas; see application_strategy.md)
|
|
- Decision: PROCEED / HOLD / NO-GO
|
|
|
|
## Requirements
|
|
| # | Requirement | Required/preferred | Direct/Adjacent/Gap/Constraint | Canonical evidence | Gate? |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
## Competitive Read
|
|
- Obvious-fit candidate:
|
|
- Dennis's advantage:
|
|
- Their advantage:
|
|
- Level/scope comparison:
|
|
|
|
## Framing Strategy
|
|
- Professional identity:
|
|
- Strongest proof points:
|
|
- Honest adjacent bridges:
|
|
- Explicit gaps:
|
|
- User directives:
|
|
|
|
## Resume Plan
|
|
- Summary: omit / 2--3 lines
|
|
- Skills: [4--6 evidence-backed lines]
|
|
- Swisscom: [4--5 selected canonical IDs]
|
|
- Bosch: [3--4 selected canonical IDs]
|
|
- Earlier experience: [0--1 per role]
|
|
- Total bullets: [normally 11--14; no page-fill quota]
|
|
- Impact evidence still needed:
|
|
|
|
## Cover Letter Decision
|
|
- YES/NO:
|
|
- Reason:
|
|
- Information it adds beyond resume:
|
|
- Verified hook sources:
|
|
|
|
## Output Files
|
|
- Resume:
|
|
- Cover letter: [path or intentionally omitted]
|
|
- Critique:
|
|
|
|
## Critique Summary
|
|
- Evidence Fit:
|
|
- Hard gate:
|
|
- Document Quality:
|
|
- Channel Strength:
|
|
- Tier 1 fixes:
|
|
|
|
## Status
|
|
- Fit gate:
|
|
- Resume:
|
|
- Cover letter:
|
|
- Critique:
|
|
- Application/outcome:
|
|
- Next:
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The session file records application state, but it is not evidence authority. Canonical claims remain authoritative.
|