dennisthiessenandClaude Opus 5 2687d652de feat(kb): extract Fraunhofer and Generali evidence from the Arbeitszeugnisse
Both references are image-only scans with no text layer, so they were read
visually. Everything recorded is quoted or directly paraphrased from the
documents; nothing is inferred.

Fraunhofer (Arbeitszeugnis 31.10.2019)
- FC-1 SCEDAS: C#, Entity Framework and MICROSOFT SQL SERVER; introduced and
  configured Jenkins and built the deployment build jobs. No language was
  recorded on this claim before today.
- FC-2 ARTUS: SPEECH RECOGNITION and ML for an automatic transcription system
  for SEA RESCUE. Separately co-authored a research proposal on predicting
  optimal MAINTENANCE TIMING with ML - genuine predictive-maintenance exposure,
  at proposal stage.
- FC-3 MISSION: microservices with EXPRESS.JS, JAVASCRIPT, DOCKER and SQLITE.

Generali (Zwischenzeugnis/Endzeugnis 30.06.2017)
- GN-1: the BDD stack is named - SERENITY-BDD, SELENIUM, JBEHAVE, with the build
  jobs administered in Jenkins.
- GN-2: UIPath RPA PoCs plus evaluation of IBM ODM Decision Center 8.7.
- GN-3: migrated web services to XLDEPLOY, CONTRIBUTED TO DESIGN AND
  ARCHITECTURE DECISIONS, and built into the Dispatcher PoC with APACHE CAMEL
  and SPRING BOOT.

11 skills newly evidenced from primary documents.

TWO OF THESE CHANGE EARLIER CONCLUSIONS:

1. Microsoft SQL Server is NOT zero. The RUAG "Senior Data Engineer (MSSQL)"
   rule-out of 2026-09-04 stated "claims.json has 0 for MSSQL, Talend and SAP".
   That premise was wrong. The rule-out may still stand on its other required
   lines - multi-year ON-PREMISE data-warehouse construction, Talend, SAP
   S/4HANA are all genuinely 0 - but the MSSQL half must not be repeated, and
   one project database in 2018-2019 is not data-warehouse experience either.

2. Spring Boot is now documented rather than asserted. The SBB interview brief
   claimed "a PoC contribution roughly a decade ago" from memory; the
   Arbeitszeugnis confirms it exactly. Still PoC-scale and still no Angular.

This is the fifth time a real capability turned out to be missing from
claims.json. The previous four surfaced by accident in conversation; these
surfaced because the user asked to read the primary documents. That is the
cheaper route and should be the default for the remaining employers.

Validator PASS, 37/37 tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Qej5SBvhcbGXHwLqNWiskM
2026-09-11 21:29:39 +02:00

Evidence-first resume kit

This repository turns verified career evidence into role-specific LaTeX resumes and, when useful, cover letters. It is designed to prevent a common failure mode of AI-assisted applications: making a document sound closer to the job description by silently overstating skills, scope, titles, or outcomes.

The workflow separates three questions that should never be confused:

  1. Evidence Fit: does the candidate actually meet the role, including hard gates?
  2. Document Quality: does the resume communicate the supported evidence clearly?
  3. Channel Strength: is the application cold, referred, or supported by a warm contact?

A polished resume cannot repair a failed qualification gate. A strong fit can still be hidden by a weak document. The system records both.

Source hierarchy

source documents
    -> structured extractions
    -> canonical claims registry
    -> experience records and role bundles
    -> session plan
    -> generated resume / optional cover letter

resume_builder/canonical/claims.json is the highest-authority career source. Generated files under output/ are never treated as evidence. historical_outputs.json records whether an older package is safe to consult, must be revalidated, or must not be reused.

Default application strategy

  • Target Staff/Senior Data Engineering first.
  • Use ML Platform/MLOps, data platform, analytics, and semiconductor profiles only where direct evidence covers the actual requirements.
  • Treat direct LLM engineering, formal model evaluation, Terraform-heavy SRE, and similar missing required experience as gates rather than keyword opportunities.
  • Record fit and outcomes without application quotas; a fit classification is a preparation signal.
  • Add a warm-channel action for core applications.

The default document is a two-page International Tech resume for US-tech/FAANG-style roles in Europe. A Swiss/DACH policy overlay is available for employers that expect local conventions. Cover letters are conditional, not automatic.

Workflow

Add evidence

  1. Put employment records, project material, papers, or notes under knowledge_base/.
  2. Run setup-extract to create a source-grounded extraction.
  3. Review it, then run setup-build-kb to update canonical claims, experience files, bundles, and support data.

Apply to a role

  1. Run make-resume with the real JD.
  2. Review the requirement table and fit gate before approving content generation.
  3. Generate and validate the LaTeX resume.
  4. Run make-cl only when the session records a justified YES decision.
  5. Run critique for separate Evidence Fit, Document Quality, and Channel Strength findings.
  6. Run edit-resume for approved repairs.

The skills live in .agents/skills/. Each application receives a session file under output/<Role>/ that preserves the JD, fit decision, claim IDs, content plan, validation results, and application status.

Validation

Validate the knowledge system:

python resume_builder/helpers/validate_resume_system.py

Validate a generated document:

python resume_builder/helpers/validate_resume_system.py --document output/Role/resume.tex

Track the uncapped application record (use summary --all for older applications too):

python resume_builder/helpers/cohort_tracker.py summary

job_scout/state/applications.json owns current status and event history. The old cohort JSON and resume_builder/reference/current_applications.md are generated views. Update status without erasing interview history:

python resume_builder/helpers/cohort_tracker.py update --id <application-id> --date YYYY-MM-DD --event interview_held --note "Interview completed"
python resume_builder/helpers/cohort_tracker.py update --id <application-id> --date YYYY-MM-DD --outcome withdrawn_by_candidate --note "Reason"
python resume_builder/helpers/application_records.py --check

Use application_records.py --render to recover stale generated views. A classification that differs from its numeric rubric needs --fit-override-reason; it is never silently relabelled.

Character counts are available only as readability diagnostics. There are no fixed character bands, equal-length bullet rules, or page-fill quotas.

Output and prerequisites

The system writes .tex source only. Compile locally with a LaTeX distribution such as MiKTeX, TeX Live, or MacTeX. Generated resumes should also be checked through PDF rendering and text extraction before submission.

See DOCS.md for the architecture and policy reference.

License

MIT; see LICENSE.

S
Description
No description provided
Readme MIT
13 MiB
0 Stars 1 Watchers 0 Forks
Languages
TeX 66.6%
Python 33.4%