Files
signal-platform/tests/unit/test_performance_summary.py
T
dennisthiessenandClaude Fable 5 ba2df8b9fd feat: shadow book + shadow-vs-manual performance comparison
The manual paper book only contains trades taken by hand, inside a 20
minute window, on days someone was available. The backtest that validated
this strategy auto-takes the top-ranked qualified setups up to capacity
every session. The forward record was therefore measuring strategy plus
discretion plus availability -- and degrading silently on busy days.

The shadow book closes that gap: it mirrors the backtest's selection rule
(top strategy_rank qualified, up to capacity, 1% fixed-fractional risk)
and shares the manual book's exit policy, so the only difference between
the two books is which setups get taken. Selection ordering reuses the
strategy_rank the scanner already stores rather than recomputing it, so
the two cannot drift apart. It runs as a near-close pipeline step right
after the scan, marking entries at the same prices a human would see.

Gate-reset re-entry state is now scoped per book -- the books diverge as
soon as their entries differ, and each must see only its own stops.

Performance view rewritten around the comparison:
  - three series (shadow, manual, SPY) from a new endpoint
  - SPY changes from a per-trade cost-basis counterfactual to plain
    buy-and-hold %, since one line has to serve two books
  - headline stats are R-multiples, not currency: the books size
    differently, so only R compares across them
  - configurable start date, because the strategy has been revised
    repeatedly and pre-cutover trades ran under rules that no longer
    exist

Migration 024 also repairs the numeric weekday crons written by 023,
rewriting only rows still holding the broken form so hand-corrected
settings survive. Its literals are inlined because bound parameters
render as NULL under 'alembic upgrade --sql'.

The shadow book is opt-in and writes nothing until enabled. Verify its
first selections match a backtest of that day's cross-section before
trusting any point on the curve.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-20 23:44:41 +02:00

102 lines
3.7 KiB
Python

"""Performance comparison: per-book series, R-multiples, and the start-date window."""
from __future__ import annotations
from datetime import date, datetime, timedelta, timezone
from types import SimpleNamespace
import pytest
from app.services import paper_trade_service as pts
from app.services.trade_policy import MANUAL_BOOK, SHADOW_BOOK
def _trade(*, book, entry=100.0, stop=95.0, close=None, shares=10.0, opened_days_ago=5):
now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
return SimpleNamespace(
ticker_id=1,
direction="long",
entry_price=entry,
stop_loss=stop,
shares=shares,
book=book,
status="closed" if close is not None else "open",
close_price=close,
opened_at=now - timedelta(days=opened_days_ago),
closed_at=now if close is not None else None,
)
class TestRMultiple:
def test_winner_measured_in_units_of_initial_risk(self):
# Entry 100, stop 95 → 5 of risk. Exit 115 → +15 → +3R.
trade = _trade(book=SHADOW_BOOK, close=115.0)
assert pts.trade_r_multiple(trade, None) == pytest.approx(3.0)
def test_full_stop_is_minus_one_r(self):
trade = _trade(book=SHADOW_BOOK, close=95.0)
assert pts.trade_r_multiple(trade, None) == pytest.approx(-1.0)
def test_open_trade_marks_to_the_latest_close(self):
trade = _trade(book=SHADOW_BOOK)
assert pts.trade_r_multiple(trade, 110.0) == pytest.approx(2.0)
def test_no_risk_distance_has_no_r(self):
trade = _trade(book=SHADOW_BOOK, entry=100.0, stop=100.0, close=120.0)
assert pts.trade_r_multiple(trade, None) is None
class TestBookStats:
def test_r_is_independent_of_position_size(self):
"""The whole point: a 10-share and a 1000-share book compare equally."""
small = pts.book_stats([_trade(book=SHADOW_BOOK, close=115.0, shares=10)], {})
large = pts.book_stats([_trade(book=MANUAL_BOOK, close=115.0, shares=1000)], {})
assert small["total_r"] == large["total_r"] == pytest.approx(3.0)
def test_counts_and_win_rate(self):
trades = [
_trade(book=SHADOW_BOOK, close=115.0),
_trade(book=SHADOW_BOOK, close=95.0),
_trade(book=SHADOW_BOOK),
]
stats = pts.book_stats(trades, {1: 110.0})
assert stats["trades"] == 3
assert stats["closed"] == 2
assert stats["open"] == 1
# +3R, -1R, +2R marked → 2 of 3 positive.
assert stats["win_rate"] == pytest.approx(66.7)
assert stats["total_r"] == pytest.approx(4.0)
class TestPerformanceStartDate:
@pytest.fixture
async def session(self):
from tests.conftest import _test_session_factory
async with _test_session_factory() as session:
yield session
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_unset_means_all_history(self, session):
assert await pts.get_performance_start(session) is None
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_reads_an_iso_date(self, session):
await pts.settings_store.upsert_setting(
session, pts.KEY_PERFORMANCE_START, "2026-07-20"
)
assert await pts.get_performance_start(session) == date(2026, 7, 20)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_garbage_falls_back_to_all_history(self, session):
"""A bad setting must not blank the whole performance card."""
await pts.settings_store.upsert_setting(
session, pts.KEY_PERFORMANCE_START, "not-a-date"
)
assert await pts.get_performance_start(session) is None
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_empty_string_means_all_history(self, session):
await pts.settings_store.upsert_setting(session, pts.KEY_PERFORMANCE_START, "")
assert await pts.get_performance_start(session) is None