Akhil Reddy Peeketi
9a7c627cc3
- Add ai_fingerprint_rules.md with banned words, structural rules, and 12-item post-gen checklist - Fix Fellowships/Honors template format: --- to period separator - Fix Publications under-review template format - Update all 4 skills to load fingerprint rules during generation - Add AI scan section to critique framework - Update resume_reference and cl_reference with em-dash limits - Reduce em-dashes in example files Co-Authored-By: Akhil Peeketi <peeketiakhilreddy@gmail.com>
93 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
93 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
# Cover Letter Generation — Reference
|
|
|
|
> CL-specific rules. Read by `/make-cl` and `/edit-resume` (for CL edits).
|
|
> Shared rules (provenance, anti-fabrication, LaTeX notation): `CLAUDE.md`
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## CL Format Rules
|
|
|
|
- Cover letter with resume: 1 page (250-300 words)
|
|
- Cover letter with CV: 1-2 pages (350-450 words). If 2 pages, page 2 >= half filled before signature.
|
|
- Full package: Resume + CL = 3 pages | CV + CL = 6-7 pages
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Institution Type Detection
|
|
|
|
- **Industry:** Any company (manufacturing, tech, consulting, energy, etc.)
|
|
- **National Lab:** DOE labs, national research facilities, government lab fellowships
|
|
- **Academic:** University postdoc or faculty positions
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## INDUSTRY Cover Letter (250-300 words, 3 paragraphs)
|
|
|
|
**P1 — HOOK:** Connect their product/technology to your achievement. State core identity + position. Open with a specific reference to their work, not a generic opener. Minimize jargon for HR readers.
|
|
|
|
**P2 — EVIDENCE:** 2-3 achievements translated to business value. Max 3-4 quantified claims. Mirror JD terms. Frame as deliverables.
|
|
|
|
**P3 — CLOSING:** Forward-looking value + active call to action. Address "why industry" positively if pivoting — frame what industry enables, not what academia lacks.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## NATIONAL LAB Cover Letter (350-450 words, 4 paragraphs)
|
|
|
|
**P1 — HOOK:** Mission alignment + division/group + position. Reference specific programmatic thrust or group's publication. Technical vocabulary OK.
|
|
|
|
**P2 — CURRENT POSITION:** Current work with mission framing. Theory-experiment bridge. HPC scale. Collaborative tone.
|
|
|
|
**P3 — PRIOR WORK:** Transferable methodology arc. Custom tools → ML infrastructure. International collaboration. Quantify.
|
|
|
|
**P4 — CLOSING:** Programmatic vision + collaboration offer + seminar availability. Lab vocabulary: "thrust area," "programmatic direction."
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## ACADEMIC Cover Letter (350-450 postdoc, 450-650 faculty; 4 paragraphs)
|
|
|
|
**P1 — HOOK:** Connection to PI's specific paper + your identity + position. Name the PI.
|
|
|
|
**P2 — CURRENT RESEARCH:** Current position with field-context framing (use significance files if available). Future direction: 1-2 sentences MANDATORY.
|
|
|
|
**P3 — PRIOR FOUNDATION:** Transferable methodology + collaboration + mentorship. Faculty: departmental fit narrative.
|
|
|
|
**P4 — CLOSING:** Forward-looking + name 2-3 faculty for collaboration. Postdoc: "contribute to your research program." Faculty: "build independent research program complementing..."
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Universal CL Rules
|
|
|
|
- Open with a specific reference to their work — avoid generic openers like "I am writing to express my interest"
|
|
- Add narrative context the CV cannot — motivation, "why this company," research vision
|
|
- Limit quantified claims to 3-5 per CL
|
|
- Credentials woven into body paragraphs, not dumped in closing
|
|
- Active call to action in closing — not passive "Thank you for your consideration"
|
|
- If pivoting domains: lead with methodology in P1, not apologetic framing
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Jargon Calibration
|
|
|
|
- **Industry:** Assume HR reads first. Minimize subfield jargon.
|
|
- **National Lab / Academic:** Domain expert reads. Use field vocabulary.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Package Reading Rules
|
|
|
|
- Resume/CV must stand alone — many hiring managers never read the CL
|
|
- CL deepens, not introduces — every major CL claim traceable to a resume/CV bullet
|
|
- No contradictions between documents
|
|
- Resume + CL = 3 pages | CV + CL = 6-7 pages
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## CL Anti-Patterns
|
|
|
|
- No generic opener ("I am writing to express my interest...")
|
|
- No defensive framing ("Despite my background in...")
|
|
- No credential dump in closing paragraph
|
|
- No repeating resume bullets verbatim — CL deepens, doesn't duplicate
|
|
- Limit quantified claims to 3-5 per CL
|
|
- **Em-dashes in CLs:** Max 2 per document. CLs are prose-heavy and em-dashes compound quickly. Use commas for parenthetical asides, colons for elaborations, periods for new sentences. Paired em-dashes (X --- detail --- Y) should use commas or parentheses instead.
|