dennisthiessenandClaude Opus 5
eecdbdade6
Build sweep run this session: 48 sources, 46 built, 2 failed. Infineon_AI_Engineer's cover letter fails on font expansion (the font is not scalable); cv_template.tex fails on unfilled placeholders, which is expected for the academic legacy path. Overfull boxes: Microsoft ISE 25.33pt, Isovalent 0.88pt. All historical, all left alone. New: resume_builder/helpers/package_manifest.py records, per application package, what a rebuild would ACTUALLY do - sources, class-file hashes, PDFs present, and the reasons a rebuild would not reproduce the submitted document. It is descriptive; nothing in it authorises rewriting a submitted file. What it found across 21 packages: - 17 are DATE-DEPENDENT. The cover letters use oday, so recompiling a historical package silently restamps it with today's date. - 1 has an INCOMPLETE SOURCE DISTRIBUTION: output/NATO_AI_ENGINEER ships no resume.cls. It builds on this machine only because a copy exists elsewhere, and the shipped PDF hid that. Not repaired by copying the newest class in - the repo carries THREE different resume.cls variants (13/7/1 copies) and older macros differ, so that "fix" could silently change a historical document. - 1 has no PDF at all, so nothing is reviewable without a build. Classification: 7 application packages were in no reuse category. Added to historical_revalidate, and the register now records the default explicitly - anything unlisted is treated as revalidate-before-reuse. Being recent is not the same as being verified; none of the seven was re-read for this. Prevention rather than repair: oday removed from the cover-letter template so new packages stop adding to the pile. A test now fails if it comes back, if the manifest goes stale, or if a package is left unclassified. Also: scan_document gained a template mode. A placeholder in a TEMPLATE is what makes it a template; the defect is one surviving into a generated document. 37/37 tests pass; counter-proof still catches all 9. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Qej5SBvhcbGXHwLqNWiskM
64 lines
2.2 KiB
TeX
64 lines
2.2 KiB
TeX
% Generate only when the session records Cover Letter Decision: YES.
|
|
% Keep to one page and use only claims present in the canonical registry and resume.
|
|
|
|
\documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}
|
|
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
|
|
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
|
|
\usepackage{lmodern}
|
|
\usepackage[a4paper,left=0.85in,right=0.85in,top=0.7in,bottom=0.7in]{geometry}
|
|
\usepackage{parskip}
|
|
\usepackage{xcolor}
|
|
\usepackage{hyperref}
|
|
\hypersetup{hidelinks}
|
|
\pagestyle{empty}
|
|
\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}
|
|
|
|
\begin{document}
|
|
|
|
{\Large\bfseries Dennis Thiessen, M.Eng.}\par
|
|
% Add "Swiss B permit; no employer sponsorship required" only when useful.
|
|
Bern, Switzerland $\vert$
|
|
\href{mailto:dennis@thiessen.io}{dennis@thiessen.io} $\vert$ +41 795 955 585 $\vert$
|
|
\href{https://linkedin.com/in/dennis-thiessen}{LinkedIn}
|
|
|
|
\vspace{1.5em}
|
|
\textit{Hiring manager or team}\\
|
|
\textit{Company}\\
|
|
\textit{City, country}
|
|
|
|
\vspace{1em}
|
|
% APPLICATION DATE -- replace with the literal date this letter is sent,
|
|
% e.g. 11 September 2026. Do NOT use \today (review finding F17, 2026-09-11):
|
|
% it makes the document date-dependent, so recompiling a historical letter silently
|
|
% restamps it with the current date. 17 existing packages already carry that defect
|
|
% and are deliberately left alone; new ones must not add to it.
|
|
[GENERATE: application date, literal]
|
|
|
|
\vspace{1em}
|
|
\textbf{Application for \textit{exact role title}}
|
|
|
|
\vspace{0.8em}
|
|
Dear \textit{name or Hiring Team},
|
|
|
|
% Paragraph 1: specific reason for this employer/role. Use a verified first-party
|
|
% hook only. State the strongest direct match without repeating the summary.
|
|
\textit{Employer-specific motivation and role thesis.}
|
|
|
|
% Paragraph 2: one or two connected examples already supported by canonical IDs
|
|
% and present in the resume. Explain scope, method and relevance. Do not invent a
|
|
% metric or imply ownership of a company-wide platform.
|
|
\textit{Evidence paragraph.}
|
|
|
|
% Optional paragraph 3: explain a transition, location/work-authorization point,
|
|
% or motivation that materially helps the decision. Delete if it adds no value.
|
|
\textit{Optional context paragraph.}
|
|
|
|
I would welcome the opportunity to discuss how this experience could support \textit{specific team or outcome}.
|
|
|
|
Kind regards,
|
|
|
|
\vspace{1.5em}
|
|
Dennis Thiessen
|
|
|
|
\end{document}
|