dennisthiessenandClaude Opus 5
afdef7eb94
Checkpoint for the 2026-09-11 project review remediation. Work by a previous agent that ran out of context; committed unchanged as a rollback point before the remaining findings land on top of it. F01 — the two agent directories had drifted into different processes - Six shared workflows under `resume_builder/reference/workflows/`; both `.agents/skills/` and `.claude/skills/` are now thin entrypoints that route to the same file instead of carrying full copies. - The `.claude` copies were the stale side: fixed bullet line variants and character budgets that the newer process had already dropped. Removing them is the point of the change, not collateral. - Parity/link regression test added; corrected the top-level file map, which pointed at a directory that does not exist. F02 — application status was stored in four places and disagreed - New registry `job_scout/state/applications.json` (26 records) with `application_records.py` (schema, validation, transactional write) and `application_tracker.py` (add/update, no quota). - AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md no longer keep their own status tables; both point at `current_applications.md`, generated from the registry. - Interview-reached is now independent of outcome, so a withdrawal after an interview can record both facts. The old tables are preserved verbatim in `job_scout/state/history/application_status_before_2026-09-11.json`. Verification: `python -m unittest discover -s tests -v` — 18/18 pass. Spot-checked that the detailed SBB and Kdo Cy notes survived the migration into the registry rather than being flattened. Known unresolved, deliberately not invented (see FIX_PROGRESS.md): Aker BP's application date and its Adjacent-despite-79 classification. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Qej5SBvhcbGXHwLqNWiskM
49 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
49 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
<!-- Shared workflow version: 2026-09-11 -->
|
|
|
|
# Edit a Resume or Cover Letter
|
|
|
|
## Startup
|
|
|
|
1. Read `shared_ops.md` and `resume_builder/canonical/claims.json` completely.
|
|
2. Run the system validator.
|
|
3. Read the session, real JD, target `.tex`, critique/feedback, selected profile rules and relevant experience files.
|
|
4. Check `historical_outputs.json`. A package marked unsafe must be regenerated from canonical sources rather than lightly polished.
|
|
5. If the package was already submitted, preserve it as history. Create a clearly named new version only when the user requests a reusable corrected document.
|
|
|
|
## Diagnose
|
|
|
|
Classify requested changes as:
|
|
|
|
- Truth/provenance correction.
|
|
- Fit/framing correction.
|
|
- Information hierarchy or readability.
|
|
- Content selection.
|
|
- Mechanical/LaTeX.
|
|
- Blocked because evidence is absent.
|
|
|
|
Do not treat whitespace, equal bullet lengths or an exact character target as defects. Do not add filler. A critique cannot authorize an unsupported claim.
|
|
|
|
Present a concise edit plan and wait for explicit confirmation unless the user already approved specific edits.
|
|
|
|
## Execute
|
|
|
|
- Source every work claim from canonical IDs and experience files.
|
|
- Keep employer/title/date hierarchy conventional.
|
|
- Preserve natural bullet lengths and verified ownership scope.
|
|
- Remove unsupported skills rather than replacing them with synonyms.
|
|
- Update a cover letter only when its session decision is YES or the user explicitly requests it.
|
|
- If edits reveal a hard fit gate, update the Evidence Fit classification; writing improvements cannot remove the gate.
|
|
|
|
## Verify
|
|
|
|
Run the validator on every edited document, compile, inspect the PDF, and verify extracted text order. Compare before/after for:
|
|
|
|
- validator failures;
|
|
- page count;
|
|
- employer/title/date visibility;
|
|
- bullet count and relevance;
|
|
- duplicated sections;
|
|
- readability at normal size.
|
|
|
|
Update the session Edit History, Document Quality, status and next action. Mark the critique stale after material edits. Present results and wait for approval.
|