Build sweep run this session: 48 sources, 46 built, 2 failed. Infineon_AI_Engineer's
cover letter fails on font expansion (the font is not scalable); cv_template.tex
fails on unfilled placeholders, which is expected for the academic legacy path.
Overfull boxes: Microsoft ISE 25.33pt, Isovalent 0.88pt. All historical, all
left alone.
New: resume_builder/helpers/package_manifest.py records, per application
package, what a rebuild would ACTUALLY do - sources, class-file hashes, PDFs
present, and the reasons a rebuild would not reproduce the submitted document.
It is descriptive; nothing in it authorises rewriting a submitted file.
What it found across 21 packages:
- 17 are DATE-DEPENDENT. The cover letters use oday, so recompiling a
historical package silently restamps it with today's date.
- 1 has an INCOMPLETE SOURCE DISTRIBUTION: output/NATO_AI_ENGINEER ships no
resume.cls. It builds on this machine only because a copy exists elsewhere,
and the shipped PDF hid that. Not repaired by copying the newest class in -
the repo carries THREE different resume.cls variants (13/7/1 copies) and older
macros differ, so that "fix" could silently change a historical document.
- 1 has no PDF at all, so nothing is reviewable without a build.
Classification: 7 application packages were in no reuse category. Added to
historical_revalidate, and the register now records the default explicitly -
anything unlisted is treated as revalidate-before-reuse. Being recent is not the
same as being verified; none of the seven was re-read for this.
Prevention rather than repair: oday removed from the cover-letter template so
new packages stop adding to the pile. A test now fails if it comes back, if the
manifest goes stale, or if a package is left unclassified.
Also: scan_document gained a template mode. A placeholder in a TEMPLATE is what
makes it a template; the defect is one surviving into a generated document.
37/37 tests pass; counter-proof still catches all 9.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Qej5SBvhcbGXHwLqNWiskM
Checkpoint for the 2026-09-11 project review remediation. Work by a previous
agent that ran out of context; committed unchanged as a rollback point before
the remaining findings land on top of it.
F01 — the two agent directories had drifted into different processes
- Six shared workflows under `resume_builder/reference/workflows/`; both
`.agents/skills/` and `.claude/skills/` are now thin entrypoints that route
to the same file instead of carrying full copies.
- The `.claude` copies were the stale side: fixed bullet line variants and
character budgets that the newer process had already dropped. Removing them
is the point of the change, not collateral.
- Parity/link regression test added; corrected the top-level file map, which
pointed at a directory that does not exist.
F02 — application status was stored in four places and disagreed
- New registry `job_scout/state/applications.json` (26 records) with
`application_records.py` (schema, validation, transactional write) and
`application_tracker.py` (add/update, no quota).
- AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md no longer keep their own status tables; both point
at `current_applications.md`, generated from the registry.
- Interview-reached is now independent of outcome, so a withdrawal after an
interview can record both facts. The old tables are preserved verbatim in
`job_scout/state/history/application_status_before_2026-09-11.json`.
Verification: `python -m unittest discover -s tests -v` — 18/18 pass.
Spot-checked that the detailed SBB and Kdo Cy notes survived the migration
into the registry rather than being flattened.
Known unresolved, deliberately not invented (see FIX_PROGRESS.md):
Aker BP's application date and its Adjacent-despite-79 classification.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Qej5SBvhcbGXHwLqNWiskM
dennisthiessenandClaude Opus 5