The v3 cutover run scored 2/4 corrections warned against v2's 3/4, which reads like a regression and is not one. Only 4 of the 11 detected corrections fall in the holdout, so recall is one event from a different headline -- and the event that flips is decided by threshold placement, not by what the score saw. "v3 without the credit sensor" catches 2025-02-21 at a *higher* threshold (35.5) than shipped v3 misses it at (32.3), because the alarm rule needs a rising edge and a lower threshold can fire outside the horizon then never reset below. Two caveats are now computed and surfaced rather than left for the reader to infer: - Holdout event count against MIN_EVENTS_FOR_CONFIDENCE. The summary sentence states how many of the detected corrections actually fall in the test period. - Warning-sensor coverage across the split. The score renormalises over what is available, so a training window predating a sensor's history freezes the threshold on a different construct than the holdout is measured against. At the cutover that is 39% of training sessions with all three sensors versus 100% of the test period, credit history beginning 2023-07-25. Restricting the threshold to sensor-matched training sessions was tested and rejected: those sessions are a calm recent stretch, so the threshold falls from 32.3 to 22.5 and false alarms rise from 3.3 to 8.6/yr. It swaps a coverage bias for a regime-selection bias. The report states its limits instead. _warning_series now returns per-session sensor counts alongside the scores. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
356 lines
13 KiB
Python
356 lines
13 KiB
Python
"""Compact chronological validation for the Regime Monitor warning score.
|
|
|
|
The study calls its outcome a 10% correction, uses the first 70% of sessions to
|
|
freeze an 80th-percentile warning threshold, and reports alarm episodes only on
|
|
the final 30%. It is still labelled exploratory while the fixed breadth basket
|
|
is reconstructed before its freeze date.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
import json
|
|
import logging
|
|
from datetime import date, datetime, timedelta, timezone
|
|
|
|
from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import AsyncSession
|
|
|
|
from app.services import breadth_service, settings_store
|
|
from app.services import regime_monitor_service as rms
|
|
from app.services.admin_service import update_setting
|
|
|
|
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
|
|
|
|
KEY_REPORT = "regime_event_study"
|
|
|
|
EVENT_THRESHOLD_PCT = 10.0
|
|
EVENT_COOLDOWN_DAYS = 40
|
|
DRAWDOWN_LOOKBACK = 252
|
|
HORIZON_DAYS = 20
|
|
WARN_PERCENTILE = 80.0
|
|
TRAIN_FRACTION = 0.70
|
|
# Below this many holdout corrections, recall is one event away from a very
|
|
# different headline and should not be read as a property of the score.
|
|
MIN_EVENTS_FOR_CONFIDENCE = 8
|
|
SENSOR_MISMATCH_TOLERANCE = 0.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _median(values: list[float]) -> float | None:
|
|
if not values:
|
|
return None
|
|
ordered = sorted(values)
|
|
middle = len(ordered) // 2
|
|
return (
|
|
float(ordered[middle])
|
|
if len(ordered) % 2
|
|
else (ordered[middle - 1] + ordered[middle]) / 2.0
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _percentile(values: list[float], pct: float) -> float | None:
|
|
ordered = sorted(v for v in values if v is not None)
|
|
if not ordered:
|
|
return None
|
|
position = (len(ordered) - 1) * pct / 100.0
|
|
lower = int(position)
|
|
upper = min(lower + 1, len(ordered) - 1)
|
|
return ordered[lower] + (ordered[upper] - ordered[lower]) * (position - lower)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def detect_events(
|
|
closes: list[float],
|
|
dates: list[date],
|
|
threshold_pct: float = EVENT_THRESHOLD_PCT,
|
|
lookback: int = DRAWDOWN_LOOKBACK,
|
|
cooldown: int = EVENT_COOLDOWN_DAYS,
|
|
) -> list[dict]:
|
|
"""Rising-edge corrections from the trailing 52-week high."""
|
|
events: list[dict] = []
|
|
previous_drawdown = 0.0
|
|
last_event = -10**9
|
|
for index, close in enumerate(closes):
|
|
high = max(closes[max(0, index - lookback + 1): index + 1])
|
|
drawdown = (high - close) / high * 100.0 if high > 0 else 0.0
|
|
if (
|
|
drawdown >= threshold_pct
|
|
and previous_drawdown < threshold_pct
|
|
and index - last_event >= cooldown
|
|
):
|
|
events.append({
|
|
"date": dates[index].isoformat(),
|
|
"index": index,
|
|
"depth_pct": round(drawdown, 1),
|
|
})
|
|
last_event = index
|
|
previous_drawdown = drawdown
|
|
return events
|
|
|
|
|
|
def alarm_episodes(
|
|
indicator: dict[date, float],
|
|
dates: list[date],
|
|
threshold: float,
|
|
start_index: int = 1,
|
|
) -> list[int]:
|
|
"""Indices where the warning crosses upward; it must reset below first."""
|
|
alarms: list[int] = []
|
|
was_high = False
|
|
if start_index > 0:
|
|
previous = indicator.get(dates[start_index - 1])
|
|
was_high = previous is not None and previous >= threshold
|
|
for index in range(start_index, len(dates)):
|
|
value = indicator.get(dates[index])
|
|
if value is None:
|
|
continue
|
|
high = value >= threshold
|
|
if high and not was_high:
|
|
alarms.append(index)
|
|
was_high = high
|
|
return alarms
|
|
|
|
|
|
def evaluate_alarms(
|
|
alarm_indices: list[int],
|
|
event_indices: list[int],
|
|
dates: list[date],
|
|
horizon: int = HORIZON_DAYS,
|
|
) -> dict:
|
|
"""Event recall, episode false alarms, and lead time for one holdout."""
|
|
leads: list[float] = []
|
|
per_event: list[dict] = []
|
|
warned = 0
|
|
for event_index in event_indices:
|
|
matching = [
|
|
alarm for alarm in alarm_indices if 0 < event_index - alarm <= horizon
|
|
]
|
|
lead = max((event_index - alarm for alarm in matching), default=None)
|
|
if lead is not None:
|
|
warned += 1
|
|
leads.append(float(lead))
|
|
per_event.append({
|
|
"date": dates[event_index].isoformat(),
|
|
"warned": lead is not None,
|
|
"lead_days": lead,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
false_alarms = sum(
|
|
1
|
|
for alarm in alarm_indices
|
|
if not any(0 < event - alarm <= horizon for event in event_indices)
|
|
)
|
|
return {
|
|
"events": len(event_indices),
|
|
"events_warned": warned,
|
|
"events_missed": len(event_indices) - warned,
|
|
"alarm_episodes": len(alarm_indices),
|
|
"false_alarms": false_alarms,
|
|
"median_lead_days": _median(leads),
|
|
"per_event": per_event,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _warning_series(
|
|
prices: dict[str, rms.Series],
|
|
breadth_divergence: dict[date, float],
|
|
dates: list[date],
|
|
config: dict,
|
|
oas_series: rms.Series | None = None,
|
|
) -> tuple[dict[date, float], dict[date, int]]:
|
|
"""Warning score per session plus how many sensors backed it.
|
|
|
|
v2 re-derived this by hand from ``WARNING_WEIGHTS`` and so would have kept
|
|
measuring the old construct after a scoring change. Since v3 dropped
|
|
fundamentals from the score, this is now exactly the live Warning score
|
|
rather than a technical-only approximation of it.
|
|
|
|
The sensor count matters because the score renormalises over whatever is
|
|
available: a session backed by two sensors is not drawn from the same
|
|
distribution as one backed by three, and the frozen threshold assumes it is.
|
|
"""
|
|
tickers = config["tickers"]
|
|
smh_full = prices.get(tickers["leaders"][0], [])
|
|
spy_full = prices.get(tickers["market"], [])
|
|
out: dict[date, float] = {}
|
|
backing: dict[date, int] = {}
|
|
for session in dates:
|
|
sensors = rms.warning_sensor_scores(
|
|
breadth_divergence.get(session),
|
|
rms._closes_asof(smh_full, session),
|
|
rms._closes_asof(spy_full, session),
|
|
rms._window_asof(oas_series, session, rms.HY_OAS_WINDOW_DAYS),
|
|
)
|
|
score = rms.score_warning_sensors(sensors)
|
|
if score is not None:
|
|
out[session] = round(score, 2)
|
|
backing[session] = sum(1 for value in sensors.values() if value is not None)
|
|
return out, backing
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _reliability(
|
|
dates: list[date],
|
|
split: int,
|
|
backing: dict[date, int],
|
|
events_detected: int,
|
|
events_in_holdout: int,
|
|
) -> dict:
|
|
"""How far the headline metrics can actually be trusted.
|
|
|
|
Two things repeatedly invite over-reading this report:
|
|
|
|
* The holdout carries only the corrections that fall in the last 30% of the
|
|
sample. A "2/4" is one event away from "3/4", and in practice the events
|
|
that flip are decided by where the frozen threshold happens to land rather
|
|
than by whether the score saw anything.
|
|
* The score renormalises over available sensors, so a training window that
|
|
predates a sensor's history freezes a threshold on a different construct
|
|
than the holdout is measured against.
|
|
"""
|
|
expected = len(rms.WARNING_WEIGHTS)
|
|
train = [backing[d] for d in dates[:split] if d in backing]
|
|
holdout = [backing[d] for d in dates[split:] if d in backing]
|
|
train_full = sum(1 for n in train if n == expected) / len(train) if train else 0.0
|
|
holdout_full = sum(1 for n in holdout if n == expected) / len(holdout) if holdout else 0.0
|
|
return {
|
|
"events_detected": events_detected,
|
|
"events_in_holdout": events_in_holdout,
|
|
"minimum_events": MIN_EVENTS_FOR_CONFIDENCE,
|
|
"underpowered": events_in_holdout < MIN_EVENTS_FOR_CONFIDENCE,
|
|
"sensors_expected": expected,
|
|
"train_full_sensor_share": round(train_full * 100, 1),
|
|
"holdout_full_sensor_share": round(holdout_full * 100, 1),
|
|
"sensor_coverage_mismatch": abs(train_full - holdout_full) > SENSOR_MISMATCH_TOLERANCE,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
async def run_event_study(
|
|
db: AsyncSession,
|
|
threshold_pct: float = EVENT_THRESHOLD_PCT,
|
|
horizon: int = HORIZON_DAYS,
|
|
) -> dict:
|
|
config = await rms.get_regime_config(db)
|
|
end = date.today()
|
|
start = end - timedelta(days=5 * 365 + 30)
|
|
prices = await rms._fetch_prices(config, start, end)
|
|
leader = config["tickers"]["leaders"][0]
|
|
benchmark = sorted(prices.get(leader, []), key=lambda item: item[0])
|
|
if len(benchmark) < 500:
|
|
return {"available": False, "reason": "insufficient benchmark history"}
|
|
|
|
dates = [d for d, _ in benchmark]
|
|
closes = [value for _, value in benchmark]
|
|
breadth, _ = await breadth_service.compute_breadth_details(
|
|
db, config["breadth_basket"], window=200, min_tickers=20
|
|
)
|
|
divergence = breadth_service.compute_divergence_series(breadth, benchmark)
|
|
oas_series = await rms._fetch_fred_series("BAMLH0A0HYM2", start, end)
|
|
warning, backing = _warning_series(prices, divergence, dates, config, oas_series)
|
|
# The credit sensor cannot reach back as far as the price history does (the
|
|
# upstream series is capped at ~3 years), so the earlier part of the sample
|
|
# scores on W1+W2 alone via renormalisation. Report where W3 starts rather
|
|
# than letting the threshold quietly straddle two sensor sets.
|
|
credit_from = oas_series[0][0].isoformat() if oas_series else None
|
|
|
|
split = max(1, min(len(dates) - 1, int(len(dates) * TRAIN_FRACTION)))
|
|
train_values = [warning[d] for d in dates[:split] if d in warning]
|
|
warn_threshold = _percentile(train_values, WARN_PERCENTILE)
|
|
if warn_threshold is None:
|
|
return {"available": False, "reason": "insufficient warning history"}
|
|
|
|
all_events = detect_events(closes, dates, threshold_pct)
|
|
holdout_events = [event["index"] for event in all_events if event["index"] >= split]
|
|
alarms = alarm_episodes(warning, dates, warn_threshold, start_index=split)
|
|
metrics = evaluate_alarms(alarms, holdout_events, dates, horizon)
|
|
holdout_sessions = max(1, len(dates) - split)
|
|
metrics["false_alarms_per_year"] = round(
|
|
metrics["false_alarms"] / (holdout_sessions / 252.0), 2
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
reliability = _reliability(dates, split, backing, len(all_events), len(holdout_events))
|
|
|
|
basket_asof = date.fromisoformat(config["basket_asof"])
|
|
retrospective = dates[split] < basket_asof
|
|
evaluation = "exploratory" if retrospective else "holdout"
|
|
lead_text = (
|
|
f"median lead {metrics['median_lead_days']:.0f} sessions"
|
|
if metrics["median_lead_days"] is not None
|
|
else "no successful warning lead"
|
|
)
|
|
summary = (
|
|
f"{evaluation.capitalize()} chronological test: warning episodes preceded "
|
|
f"{metrics['events_warned']}/{metrics['events']} 10% corrections; "
|
|
f"{metrics['events_missed']} missed, {metrics['false_alarms_per_year']:.1f} "
|
|
f"false alarms/year, {lead_text}. "
|
|
f"{metrics['events']} of {reliability['events_detected']} detected corrections "
|
|
f"fall in the test period"
|
|
+ (
|
|
f"; too few to read recall as a property of the score."
|
|
if reliability["underpowered"]
|
|
else "."
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
per_event = metrics.pop("per_event")
|
|
|
|
report = {
|
|
"available": True,
|
|
"methodology": rms.METHODOLOGY,
|
|
"generated_at": datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat(),
|
|
"evaluation": evaluation,
|
|
"summary": summary,
|
|
"params": {
|
|
"benchmark": leader,
|
|
"outcome": "10% correction from trailing 52-week high",
|
|
"event_threshold_pct": threshold_pct,
|
|
"event_cooldown_days": EVENT_COOLDOWN_DAYS,
|
|
"horizon_days": horizon,
|
|
"train_fraction": TRAIN_FRACTION,
|
|
"warn_percentile": WARN_PERCENTILE,
|
|
"warn_threshold": round(warn_threshold, 1),
|
|
"credit_sensor_from": credit_from,
|
|
"basket_hash": rms._basket_hash(config["breadth_basket"]),
|
|
"basket_asof": config["basket_asof"],
|
|
},
|
|
"sample": {
|
|
"start": dates[0].isoformat(),
|
|
"end": dates[-1].isoformat(),
|
|
"train_end": dates[split - 1].isoformat(),
|
|
"test_start": dates[split].isoformat(),
|
|
"sessions": len(dates),
|
|
"holdout_sessions": holdout_sessions,
|
|
},
|
|
"metrics": metrics,
|
|
"reliability": reliability,
|
|
"events": per_event,
|
|
"recent_breadth": [
|
|
{"date": d.isoformat(), "breadth": breadth[d], "warning": warning.get(d)}
|
|
for d in dates[-90:]
|
|
if d in breadth
|
|
],
|
|
}
|
|
logger.info(json.dumps({
|
|
"event": "regime_event_study_complete",
|
|
"evaluation": evaluation,
|
|
"events": metrics["events"],
|
|
"events_detected": reliability["events_detected"],
|
|
"warned": metrics["events_warned"],
|
|
"false_alarms_per_year": metrics["false_alarms_per_year"],
|
|
"underpowered": reliability["underpowered"],
|
|
"sensor_coverage_mismatch": reliability["sensor_coverage_mismatch"],
|
|
}))
|
|
return report
|
|
|
|
|
|
async def run_and_store(db: AsyncSession) -> dict:
|
|
report = await run_event_study(db)
|
|
await update_setting(db, KEY_REPORT, json.dumps(report))
|
|
return report
|
|
|
|
|
|
async def get_event_study_report(db: AsyncSession) -> dict | None:
|
|
setting = await settings_store.get_setting(db, KEY_REPORT)
|
|
if setting is None:
|
|
return None
|
|
try:
|
|
report = json.loads(setting.value)
|
|
except (TypeError, ValueError):
|
|
return None
|
|
return report if report.get("methodology") == rms.METHODOLOGY else None
|