Five UI problems, all reported from using the page.
Expanding "How this is measured" shoved every control down, because the
disclosure and the run controls shared one flex row. They no longer do: run
status and the controls that start a new run sit together on one line, and the
explainer is below them where growing it moves nothing.
A long strategy name wrapped the dropdown trigger onto three lines and dragged
the row out of alignment. The trigger now truncates with the full text on hover
— a wrapping dropdown is broken anywhere, so the fix is in the primitive — and
the twelve-character "Production: " prefix is a bullet.
"Sortino 2.72" answered nothing. Each risk-adjusted metric now carries a meter:
a track showing where the value sits, ticks at the band edges, and the band word.
Colour never travels alone. Bands are deliberately stricter than textbook ranges
because this universe is today's survivors replayed backward, which flatters
every ratio — that caveat is stated next to them rather than left implied.
The two tile rows were different sizes, which read as inconsistent rather than
as hierarchy. Every tile is the same size now and grouping carries the ranking:
top row is raw outcome and takes no meters, second row is risk-adjusted ratios
and all take meters. Sharpe moved down to join them — it is one of those ratios,
and leaving it above made it the only metered tile in a row of bare ones.
The recommendation led with a long bold sentence that describes the
configuration, not a verdict, while the actual findings were small grey text.
Findings now come first, each split into label and detail on the colon the
backend strings already carry, and the configuration is a footer.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
dennisthiessenandClaude Opus 5
3a2d548610