# Sector-residual momentum (Tier-1 alpha research) **Status:** **CLOSED / REJECTED** — do not resurrect without a new pre-registered protocol. **Branch:** `research/earnings-gap-and-sue` (final grade) · earlier short-window work on `research/sector-residual-momentum` **Production impact:** none. Market residual 12-1 remains the production momentum leg. **Authoritative deep grade:** `reports/sector-resid-deep-20260719-113319.json` (**FAIL**) **Short-window A/B (superseded for promotion):** `reports/sector-residual-20260719-083356.json` — knife-edge only; not decisive after deep masked retest. ### Closure (2026-07-19) Pre-registered deep test on repaired snapshot + liquid-1500 mask: | check | result | |---|---| | weeks extended (≫ 35) | pass (83) | | sign +, reliable, eras both + | pass | | t ≥ `mom_12_1_resid` same CS | pass (1.69 ≥ 1.30) | | \|mean IC\| ≥ 0.03 | **fail (0.0268)** | **Verdict:** Task 1 CLOSED — sector residual dead on deep evidence. `mom_12_1_sector_demeaned` remains DEAD for promotion. No further sector-residual variants from this thread. --- ## Pre-registration (locked before first research run) ### Hypothesis Residualizing 12–1 momentum against the sector, not only the market, reduces factor volatility at similar return (Blitz / Huij / Martens-style) → higher Sharpe on the production book when the residual replaces market-only residual as the momentum leg. ### Signals (candidates) | signal | construction | |---|---| | `mom_12_1_sector_resid` | Two-factor residual vs SPY + ticker’s sector ETF. Same window as `mom_12_1_resid`: ≥100 daily obs, 252-bar lookback, 21-bar skip; two-factor OLS betas **without intercept**; cumulate residual returns over the formation window. | | `mom_12_1_sector_demeaned` | Plain `mom_12_1` minus the **cross-sectional** mean of `mom_12_1` within the same GICS sector that week (≥2 names in sector). No regression. | ### Baselines (same run, same cross-sections — iron rule) Always report side-by-side with: - `mom_12_1` - `mom_12_1_resid` Computed on the **identical** weekly non-overlapping cross-sections in this run. Never compare against IC numbers from another report. ### Iron rule (IC harness) Source of truth: `_signal_evaluation` in `app/services/backtest_service.py`. - Mean weekly Spearman IC on **non-overlapping** weekly windows - Bar: \|mean IC\| ≥ ~0.03, **consistent positive sign**, `reliable: true` (≥ 12 windows) ### Promotion to portfolio A/B (candidate → book) A candidate promotes to A/B **only if**: 1. It clears the iron-rule bar **and** 2. Its IC **t-stat ≥** that of `mom_12_1_resid` on the same cross-sections. ### Portfolio A/B grading (if and only if IC promotion fires) - Swap candidate in as the **momentum leg** of the production 80/20 momentum/vol rank **and** as the gate-percentile signal. - `fill_mode=close`, `COST_PER_SIDE = 0.001`, full config otherwise unchanged. - Validation window = entries ≥ **2024-07-01** (call it **validation**, not holdout — contaminated by prior experiments). - Pre-registered promotion bar: - validation Sharpe ≥ control − 0.5·SE - full-period Sharpe and max-DD **not worse** than control - Report Lo / Mertens-adjusted SEs. ### Optional sector-cap sub-experiment Only if labels are in **and** A/B ran: max **3** positions per sector in the 10-slot book. Same A/B grading. **Tail-trim presumption of guilt** (rule 4): report entry counts and both tails of the R distribution. Rising win rate with falling Sharpe/CAGR = red flag → do not promote. **This run:** sector-cap arm **not executed** (optional; A/B unconstrained book only). Can be a human-approved follow-up. ### Verdict labels | label | meaning | |---|---| | **PROMOTE** | Clears pre-registered bar; human decides next (wire design separate) | | **PARK** | Inconclusive / weak; keep machinery, no book change | | **DEAD** | Failed iron rule or worse than residual baseline with clear sign | ### Explicit non-goals - No production deploy from this doc - Do not resurrect: take-profit exits, EV gate, regime entry-blocking, inverse-vol sizing, gap-caps, unconditional FIP filter --- ## Data provenance ### Snapshot race guard | check | result | |---|---| | Snapshot path | `backtest_snapshots/prod.sqlite` | | Manifest | none (expected for prod snapshot); bar-count sanity applied | | Tickers / OHLCV | **506** / **629,263** | | Bars min / avg / max | 14 / 1246.1 / 1261 | | OHLCV range | 2021-06-24 → 2026-07-02 | | Partial-build red flags | none (avg bars healthy) | Integrity fingerprint on same run: `fip_id` mean IC **−0.045** / t **−2.91** (35 weeks, N≈498) — matches the established prod fingerprint. ### Sector labels | source | count | |---|---:| | Public S&P 500 GICS CSV | 496 newly filled | | FMP profile requests | 10 (all missing after CSV) | | Mapped / universe | **505 / 506 (99.8%)** | | With mappable ETF | 505 | | Still missing | **RHM** only | Persist path: `data/research/ticker_sector_map.json`. FMP aliases (`Technology`, `Consumer Defensive`, `Financial Services`) map to SPDRs via the alias table in `app/services/sector_map.py`. ### Sector ETFs in `benchmark_prices` (auxiliary only — not tradable) | symbol | bars | min date | max date | |---|---:|---|---| | SPY | 1516 | 2020-07-06 | 2026-07-17 | | XLB…XLY (11) | 1512 each | 2020-07-10 | 2026-07-17 | Fetched via Alpaca `Adjustment.SPLIT` into **`benchmark_prices`** (same table as SPY) so they never enter the ticker universe or candidate replay. --- ## Results Generated: `2026-07-19T08:33:56` ### IC harness (identical cross-sections, production 506-name universe) | signal | mean_ic | ic_t_stat | weeks | avg_N | reliable | ic+_pct | quintile spread | |---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---|---:|---:| | **mom_12_1_sector_resid** | **0.0578** | **2.34** | 35 | 497.7 | true | 65.7 | 0.0245 | | mom_12_1_resid | 0.0552 | 1.98 | 35 | 497.7 | true | 60.0 | 0.0207 | | mom_12_1 | 0.0531 | 1.61 | 35 | 497.7 | true | 65.7 | 0.0206 | | mom_12_1_sector_demeaned | 0.0340 | 1.32 | 35 | 496.7 | true | 62.9 | 0.0154 | ### IC promotion grades | candidate | iron rule | t ≥ resid | promote_to_ab | |---|---|---|---| | `mom_12_1_sector_resid` | pass (IC 0.058, +sign, reliable) | **yes** (2.34 ≥ 1.98) | **yes** | | `mom_12_1_sector_demeaned` | pass (IC 0.034, +sign, reliable) | **no** (1.32 < 1.98) | **no** | ### Portfolio A/B — `mom_12_1_sector_resid` as residual leg Config: production 80/20 residual/high-vol rank + gate percentile, `fill_mode=close`, cost 10 bps/side, ATR trail / gate-reset re-entry as live. Validation split 2024-07-01. | window | arm | Sharpe | Sharpe SE (Mertens) | CAGR % | max DD % | trades | n_days | |---|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:| | train | control (resid) | 1.30 | 0.685 | 29.2 | 21.4 | 176 | 525 | | train | treatment (sector resid) | **1.57** | 0.677 | **35.5** | **19.8** | 176 | 530 | | validation | control | **2.92** | 0.709 | **76.3** | **11.7** | 150 | 501 | | validation | treatment | 2.57 | 0.701 | 66.3 | 14.8 | 163 | 501 | | full | control | 2.09 | 0.497 | 51.6 | 21.4 | 322 | 1000 | | full | treatment | 2.09 | 0.491 | 51.0 | **19.8** | 337 | 1005 | **Pre-registered A/B checks** | check | result | |---|---| | val Sharpe ≥ control − 0.5·SE | **pass** (2.57 ≥ 2.92 − 0.5×0.701 = 2.5695) — **knife-edge** | | full Sharpe not worse | **pass** (2.09 = 2.09) | | full max DD not worse | **pass** (19.8 < 21.4) | Qualified long candidates: control 1086 vs treatment 1210 (sector residual gates a slightly larger set). --- ## Verdict (final — archived) | signal | verdict | note | |---|---|---| | **`mom_12_1_sector_resid`** | **CLOSED / REJECTED** | Deep masked IC 0.0268 < 0.03 bar (`sector-resid-deep-20260719-113319`). Short-window PROMOTE superseded. | | **`mom_12_1_sector_demeaned`** | **DEAD** | Never cleared t vs market residual; stays dead. | Short-window evidence below is **historical only** (pre-deep retest). Do not use it to reopen promotion. ### Read carefully (archived context) 1. Short-window IC (0.058 / t 2.34 vs resid 0.055 / t 1.98 on 35 weeks) and knife-edge A/B looked openable — that was the data gap era (shallow prod bars). 2. Deep repaired + liquid-1500 retest closed the case: weeks 83, mild +IC, **below bar**. 3. Production keeps **market** residual 12-1. Research harness may still *emit* sector residual for diagnostics; it is not a promotion candidate. 4. **Do not resurrect** without a new pre-registered protocol and new data. --- ## What a human must decide next **Nothing on Task 1** — archived. Optional: leave research machinery in tree (harmless) or delete later as cleanup; not a strategy decision. --- ## Implementation notes Research runners and sector-residual harness hooks were **removed after close** (2026-07-19 cleanup). Evidence remains in the report artifacts below. Do not re-add without a new pre-registered protocol. --- ## Artifacts | file | role | |---|---| | `reports/sector-resid-deep-20260719-113319.json` | **Authoritative deep FAIL** | | `reports/sector-residual-20260719-083356.json` | Short-window IC/A/B (superseded for promotion) |