# Regime Monitor v3 methodology The Regime Monitor is an observational AI/Tech risk thermometer. It does not gate entries, exits, position size, ranking, or alerts about individual setups. v3 supersedes v2. Every parameter below was calibrated against the 408 v2 sessions ending 2026-07-24, reproduced offline from the same Alpaca and FRED inputs the live job uses; the reproduction matched the stored prod distribution exactly (State avg 22.6/22.7, p80 35.1, max 91.2, P3 pegged 39, W1 live 108). ## What changed and why **Fundamentals left the score.** F1 (capex) and F3 (good-news-stock-down) carried 12 + 8 of 100 Warning points. Pegged at maximum stress they produced a Warning of exactly 20.0 — below the event study's 25.3 alarm threshold, and still inside the "stable" band. The sourced observation could not change any published conclusion, so refreshing it looked like it did nothing. They are now a qualitative overlay reported beside the scores. Capex also stopped scoring `raising` and `holding` identically at 0: `holding` is the deceleration case and now scores 50, so a boom no longer reads the same as a stall. **The drawdown sensor stopped saturating.** v2 used `dd_pct * 5`, reaching 100 at a 20% drawdown — the 90th percentile of the observed distribution. 39 of 408 sessions sat at exactly 100 with no resolution left, and the price pillar showed the top band on 13.5% of sessions. v3 uses named anchors with headroom past the observed 36% maximum, and blends leader/confirm 2:1 as P1 and P2 already did instead of taking `max()`. P3's realized share of State falls from 65% to 40%, matching its nominal weight. **Warning gained a sensor with range.** The HY OAS *level* is pinned at zero below the 3.5 mild anchor (2.77 at the cutover), so credit contributed nothing in a calm tape. Its 20-session rate of change still does, and spread widening is a classic lead. **The credit percentile leg was removed.** Its reference window silently shrank from 10 years to 3 when ICE restricted the upstream series in April 2026, after which it scored 20 points of stress at a spread the same sensor's anchors call "mild". See Calibration below. **Breadth loss counts during declines.** v2's divergence gate was `price_ret >= 0`, so the sensor zeroed during every selloff. On 2026-07-24 the basket shed 10 points of participation in 20 sessions while SMH fell 11.9% and Warning printed exactly 0. v3 tapers to a floor instead: deterioration counts fully when price masks it (true divergence, the dangerous pre-top case) and at 35% when price confirms it. Breadth *level* lives in State, but breadth *velocity* appears nowhere else, so this is not double counting. **Bands are per axis.** v2 Warning never exceeded 64.9 in 408 sessions while State reached 91.2, yet both used 30/60/80 with quadrant dividers at 60. The upper half of the Warning axis was unreachable. ## Outputs **State** — current structural stress: - Price structure, 40%: `max(P1, P2, P3)`, one capped vote for correlated reads. - Fixed-basket breadth level, 25%. - HY option-adjusted credit spread level, 20%. - VIX level, 15%. **Warning** — deterioration and divergence: - Fixed-basket breadth divergence, 45%. - 60-session SMH/SPY relative-strength deterioration, 30%. - HY OAS 20-session widening, 25%. Combined, RSP/SPY (former F4), and the NVDA canary (former P6) do not enter v3. ## Calibration P3 drawdown anchors, as (drawdown %, score): 0→0, 4→10, 8→25, 16→50, 28→78, 40→100, flat outside. Credit impulse is relative (+35% over 20 sessions = 100) rather than absolute, because +0.5pp means something very different at an OAS of 2.7 than at 8.0. Bands are round, meaning-anchored numbers, not percentile fits — percentile thresholds would drift on every rebuild and silently rewrite what past snapshots meant. Realized shares over the calibration window: | Axis | stable | watch | elevated | breaking | thresholds | |------|--------|-------|----------|----------|------------| | State | 73.3% | 15.0% | 8.3% | 3.4% | 20 / 50 / 80 | | Warning | 69.4% | 19.6% | 7.6% | 3.4% | 20 / 40 / 60 | Quadrant dividers sit at each axis's watch/elevated boundary: State 50, Warning 40. Scores renormalize over available fixed weights, but a band is published only at 75% or greater coverage. Trend deltas are suppressed when the participating pillar set changes. Zero means ordinary/healthy; only stress contributes. Credit level is the named HY OAS anchors alone: 3.5 mild, 5.0 elevated, 7.0 stressed, linear between, and nothing else. v2 blended those anchors at 70% with a 30% upper-tail percentile over a nominally 10-year window. That leg was removed rather than repaired. ICE restricted FRED to a rolling 3-year window for `BAMLH0A0HYM2` in April 2026 — the series metadata states it outright ("Starting in April 2026, this series will only include 3 years of observations"), and an unbounded request returns the same 795 observations as a 30-year one. The v2 percentile therefore ranked the current spread against three uniformly tight years (range 2.59–4.61 over the calibration window), which made it fire early and saturate absurdly: at an OAS of 3.50 — the level the anchors call *mild*, scoring zero stress — the blended sensor read 20.1, and the percentile leg pegged at 100 by an OAS of 4.5. Across the 408 sessions it roughly tripled the credit sensor's average (2.70 vs 1.00) and more than doubled its nonzero days (60 vs 27). The anchors already encode the long-run distribution as constants, so the percentile was a second, noisier estimate of the same thing. What it was genuinely reaching for — "unusual versus recent history" — is now W3 on the Warning axis, computed as a rate of change, which is where deterioration belongs. Removing it moved State's average by −0.4 and its maximum by −3.8, left Warning bit-identical, and did not shift any band threshold. A long-history alternative (`BAA10Y`, Fed-published, 7,712 observations back to 1997) was considered and rejected: ranking an HY spread against investment-grade history is not a coherent statistic, and it would rescue a leg that is redundant anyway. Every snapshot now records `data_quality.credit_history_days` and `vix_history_days`. This defect was invisible for roughly three months because nothing asserted the window the code claimed; the spans make a future upstream truncation show up in the record instead of quietly reshaping a sensor. **Survivorship caveat.** The basket was frozen 2026-07-15 but the calibration window reaches back to 2024, so names were partly selected for having done well. Every distribution above inherits that bias. It is the same bias v2 carried, so the v2/v3 comparison is like-for-like, but the absolute band shares are optimistic. ## Point-in-time record The first run under a new `METHODOLOGY` rebuilds the latest 400 trading sessions with sufficient sensor warm-up; routine runs thereafter insert/update only the latest trading date. The history API and main chart show only snapshots matching the current methodology, so a bump reseeds the series rather than splicing two formulas into one line. The fundamental overlay keeps its effective date (normally the next session after collection) and is never replayed backward, so a rebuild cannot stamp today's observation onto historical snapshots. Because the observation is stored in a single slot, a refresh replaces the previously effective record: the snapshot therefore reports the overlay as `pending` until the new effective date, and the live reading additionally carries `fundamental_context` so a just-collected observation is visible immediately rather than appearing to have done nothing. Each snapshot stores the fixed basket symbols, hash, and freeze date. Reconstructed history before that freeze date is retrospective/exploratory. ## Warning study The study calls the outcome a **10% correction**, not a regime break. The first 70% of sessions freezes the 80th-percentile warning threshold; alarm episodes are measured on the final 30%. Because v3 dropped fundamentals from the score, the study now measures exactly the live Warning score rather than a technical-only approximation of it, and both are computed from one shared sensor definition (`warning_sensor_scores`) so they cannot drift apart. A cached report is discarded when its methodology no longer matches, so the panel reverts to "not run yet" after a bump rather than showing stale numbers. **Re-run the Event Study job after cutting over to v3.** ## Operator rule Quadrant alerts default off for new/reset configurations. When enabled they require fresh inputs, at least 75% coverage on both axes, two consecutive daily confirmations, hysteresis, and cooldown. Every alert states: **Risk thermometer — not a trade signal.**