MKC showed 5 targets all far/Aggressive: target selection was top-5 by
quality (0.35*R:R + ...), and R:R grows with distance, so far levels
crowded out every nearby one.
generate_targets now selects for spread: always include the nearest
level, plus the best-quality representative from each distance band
(Conservative <=2.9 ATR, Moderate <=4.6 ATR, Aggressive beyond), then
fill remaining slots by quality. Restores a Conservative/Moderate/
Aggressive mix with the nearest target always present.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Fixes nonsensical "Conservative @ 90%" on far targets (AJG: +39% target
labelled Conservative/90%).
- Probability = chance of touching the level within the outcome horizon
under a driftless random walk: 2*(1 - Phi(d / (ATR*sqrt(T)))), T=30d to
match the outcome evaluator. Distance (in ATR) dominates; strength and
alignment modulate modestly. Far targets are now correctly low-prob.
- Classification derived from that probability (>=60 Conservative,
40-60 Moderate, <40 Aggressive) instead of distance-rank.
- Combined with the most-likely-worthwhile primary pick, the nearest
strong resistance becomes the Conservative primary; far levels demote
to low-probability stretch targets.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- JWT now carries a username claim; sidebar shows "Signed in as <name>"
instead of the bare user id (sub). Re-login required for the new claim.
- Signals: Min R:R / Min Confidence inputs reflect the effective filter —
auto-filled from the activation gate when "Qualified only" is on, reset
to 0 when off (no more misleading 0 while the gate is active).
- Signals layout: Run Scanner moved to its own action row (it's a job
trigger, not a filter); qualified toggle grouped with the refinement
filters under one Filters panel.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Triggered by CNC showing "LONG (High Confidence)" with SHORT reasoning
and no long setup.
- A: recommendation action + reasoning are ticker-level and identical
on both setups; reasoning always matches the shown action
- B: recommended_action only picks a direction with a tradeable setup;
strong bias with no setup (e.g. price at ATH) → NEUTRAL with an
explanatory reason instead of a fake LONG_HIGH
- C: confidence is a directional-agreement model — opposing signals push
it below 50 (SHORT on a 92-technical/99-momentum stock ~0%, not 55%)
- D: fundamental score requires >=2 real metrics (market-cap-only no
longer yields a high score)
- E: RSI score peaks at healthy momentum (~60) and penalizes
overbought/oversold extremes instead of treating RSI 90 as maximal
- F: fundamentals chain merges fields across providers (FMP market cap
+ Finnhub P/E) instead of stopping at the first with any field
- NEUTRAL label: "No Clear Setup" (covers untradeable-bias case)
Scores recompute on next scan/scoring run; C and E shift score
distributions intentionally.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
dennisthiessen
Dennis Thiessen