fix: harden shadow book against book leakage (review of ba2df8b)
Review of the shadow book found seven ways the two books could leak into
each other; all are fixed here. The most serious silently invalidated the
comparison the shadow book exists to make.
- Shadow holdings no longer suppress the manual candidate list. The
open-trade exclusion filtered on any book, so shadow taking the
top-ranked names removed exactly those from the user's list and alerts,
confining the discretionary book to leftovers. Scoped to the manual
book. Closed-trade alerts and paper-book equity were leaking the same
way and are likewise scoped.
- Shadow sizing now matches _simulate_portfolio: min(1% risk, 20% notional
cap, available cash) from marked equity, plus the sub- dust guard.
Previously risk-only from realized equity, so a tight stop produced a
multiples-of-equity leveraged position the strategy would never take.
- Shadow only trades setups from the scan that just ran (<6h old) with one
setup per ticker. A failed or disabled scan step could otherwise open
positions from a prior session at stale prices.
- Gate-reset transitions are observed for both books, so a shadow stop-out
completes fail -> requalify instead of staying locked forever.
- Manual list/close endpoints default to the manual book and reject
hand-closing shadow trades; the performance endpoint is scoped to the
caller so 'your picks' is not every user's book.
- run_shadow_book is registered as a paused job so Admin can trigger it.
Also anchors three pre-existing paper-trade tests (and the new alpaca
window test) on the UTC date. They build fixtures from the local date but
the service stamps opened_at in UTC, so they failed only between 00:00 and
02:00 in a UTC+hh timezone -- latent on ba2df8b, exposed by the clock.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
|
||||
"""The two books must not leak into each other.
|
||||
|
||||
Regression cover for the review of ba2df8b. Each test here pins a way the
|
||||
shadow book could quietly corrupt the discretionary record — or be corrupted
|
||||
by it — which would invalidate the comparison the shadow book exists to make.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
|
||||
|
||||
import pytest
|
||||
|
||||
from app.exceptions import ValidationError
|
||||
from app.models.paper_trade import PaperTrade
|
||||
from app.models.ticker import Ticker
|
||||
from app.models.user import User
|
||||
from app.services import paper_trade_service as pts
|
||||
from app.services.trade_policy import (
|
||||
MANUAL_BOOK,
|
||||
SHADOW_BOOK,
|
||||
get_reentry_gate_locks,
|
||||
observe_reentry_gate_transitions,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.fixture
|
||||
async def session():
|
||||
from tests.conftest import _test_session_factory
|
||||
|
||||
async with _test_session_factory() as session:
|
||||
yield session
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
async def _seed(session) -> int:
|
||||
session.add(User(id=1, username="owner", password_hash="x"))
|
||||
session.add(Ticker(id=1, symbol="AAA", name="AAA"))
|
||||
await session.commit()
|
||||
return 1
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _trade(*, book, status="open", close_reason=None, closed_at=None, user_id=1):
|
||||
now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
|
||||
return PaperTrade(
|
||||
user_id=user_id,
|
||||
ticker_id=1,
|
||||
direction="long",
|
||||
entry_price=100.0,
|
||||
shares=10.0,
|
||||
stop_loss=95.0,
|
||||
target=115.0,
|
||||
status=status,
|
||||
opened_at=now - timedelta(days=3),
|
||||
closed_at=closed_at,
|
||||
close_price=95.0 if status == "closed" else None,
|
||||
close_reason=close_reason,
|
||||
book=book,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestManualEndpoints:
|
||||
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
||||
async def test_list_excludes_shadow_by_default(self, session):
|
||||
"""Open Positions must not silently mix the autonomous book in."""
|
||||
await _seed(session)
|
||||
session.add_all([_trade(book=MANUAL_BOOK), _trade(book=SHADOW_BOOK)])
|
||||
await session.commit()
|
||||
|
||||
rows = await pts.list_trades(session, user_id=1)
|
||||
|
||||
assert len(rows) == 1
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
||||
async def test_list_can_span_both_books_deliberately(self, session):
|
||||
await _seed(session)
|
||||
session.add_all([_trade(book=MANUAL_BOOK), _trade(book=SHADOW_BOOK)])
|
||||
await session.commit()
|
||||
|
||||
rows = await pts.list_trades(session, user_id=1, book=None)
|
||||
|
||||
assert len(rows) == 2
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
||||
async def test_shadow_trades_cannot_be_closed_by_hand(self, session):
|
||||
"""A hand-closed shadow trade is no longer what the strategy would do."""
|
||||
await _seed(session)
|
||||
trade = _trade(book=SHADOW_BOOK)
|
||||
session.add(trade)
|
||||
await session.commit()
|
||||
|
||||
with pytest.raises(ValidationError, match="exit policy"):
|
||||
await pts.close_trade(session, 1, trade.id, 110.0)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestGateResetCycle:
|
||||
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
||||
async def test_shadow_stop_completes_fail_then_requalify(self, session):
|
||||
"""The full cycle must advance for the shadow book, or a stopped ticker
|
||||
stays locked out forever."""
|
||||
await _seed(session)
|
||||
closed = datetime.now(timezone.utc) - timedelta(days=2)
|
||||
session.add(
|
||||
_trade(book=SHADOW_BOOK, status="closed", close_reason="stop", closed_at=closed)
|
||||
)
|
||||
await session.commit()
|
||||
|
||||
assert 1 in await get_reentry_gate_locks(session, book=SHADOW_BOOK)
|
||||
|
||||
# Day 1: ticker no longer qualifies → failure observed.
|
||||
await observe_reentry_gate_transitions(
|
||||
session,
|
||||
evaluated_ticker_ids=[1],
|
||||
qualified_ticker_ids=[],
|
||||
observed_at=closed + timedelta(days=1),
|
||||
book=SHADOW_BOOK,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert 1 in await get_reentry_gate_locks(session, book=SHADOW_BOOK)
|
||||
|
||||
# Day 2: qualifies again → lock releases.
|
||||
await observe_reentry_gate_transitions(
|
||||
session,
|
||||
evaluated_ticker_ids=[1],
|
||||
qualified_ticker_ids=[1],
|
||||
observed_at=closed + timedelta(days=2),
|
||||
book=SHADOW_BOOK,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert 1 not in await get_reentry_gate_locks(session, book=SHADOW_BOOK)
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
||||
async def test_observing_one_book_does_not_move_the_other(self, session):
|
||||
await _seed(session)
|
||||
closed = datetime.now(timezone.utc) - timedelta(days=2)
|
||||
session.add_all(
|
||||
[
|
||||
_trade(book=SHADOW_BOOK, status="closed", close_reason="stop", closed_at=closed),
|
||||
_trade(book=MANUAL_BOOK, status="closed", close_reason="stop", closed_at=closed),
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
await session.commit()
|
||||
|
||||
await observe_reentry_gate_transitions(
|
||||
session,
|
||||
evaluated_ticker_ids=[1],
|
||||
qualified_ticker_ids=[],
|
||||
observed_at=closed + timedelta(days=1),
|
||||
book=SHADOW_BOOK,
|
||||
)
|
||||
await observe_reentry_gate_transitions(
|
||||
session,
|
||||
evaluated_ticker_ids=[1],
|
||||
qualified_ticker_ids=[1],
|
||||
observed_at=closed + timedelta(days=2),
|
||||
book=SHADOW_BOOK,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Shadow released; manual never observed, so it stays locked.
|
||||
assert 1 not in await get_reentry_gate_locks(session, book=SHADOW_BOOK)
|
||||
assert 1 in await get_reentry_gate_locks(session, book=MANUAL_BOOK)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestPerformanceScoping:
|
||||
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
||||
async def test_manual_side_is_scoped_to_the_caller(self, session):
|
||||
"""'Your picks' must not aggregate another user's discretionary book."""
|
||||
await _seed(session)
|
||||
session.add(User(id=2, username="other", password_hash="x"))
|
||||
await session.commit()
|
||||
session.add_all(
|
||||
[
|
||||
_trade(book=MANUAL_BOOK, user_id=1),
|
||||
_trade(book=MANUAL_BOOK, user_id=2),
|
||||
_trade(book=SHADOW_BOOK, user_id=1),
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
await session.commit()
|
||||
|
||||
mine = await pts.list_trades(session, user_id=1)
|
||||
theirs = await pts.list_trades(session, user_id=2)
|
||||
|
||||
assert len(mine) == 1
|
||||
assert len(theirs) == 1
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user