Files
claude-resume-kit/resume_builder/reference/cl_reference.md
T
Akhil Reddy Peeketi c51b49882f Initial release — claude-resume-kit v1.0
Complete AI-assisted resume/CV generation framework:
- 6 Claude Code skills (setup-extract, setup-build-kb, make-resume, make-cl, edit-resume, critique)
- LaTeX templates (resume, CV, cover letter) with .cls class files
- 6 reference docs (shared_ops, resume_reference, cl_reference, critical_rules, session_file_template, critique_framework)
- Fictional Dr. Jordan Chen examples (extraction, experience, bundle, config, session, JD)
- Knowledge base scaffolding and config template
- README with setup guide and workflow documentation
2026-03-09 02:42:10 -06:00

3.7 KiB

Cover Letter Generation — Reference

CL-specific rules. Read by /make-cl and /edit-resume (for CL edits). Shared rules (provenance, anti-fabrication, LaTeX notation): CLAUDE.md


CL Format Rules

  • Cover letter with resume: 1 page (250-300 words)
  • Cover letter with CV: 1-2 pages (350-450 words). If 2 pages, page 2 >= half filled before signature.
  • Full package: Resume + CL = 3 pages | CV + CL = 6-7 pages

Institution Type Detection

  • Industry: Any company (manufacturing, tech, consulting, energy, etc.)
  • National Lab: DOE labs, national research facilities, government lab fellowships
  • Academic: University postdoc or faculty positions

INDUSTRY Cover Letter (250-300 words, 3 paragraphs)

P1 — HOOK: Connect their product/technology to your achievement. State core identity + position. Open with a specific reference to their work, not a generic opener. Minimize jargon for HR readers.

P2 — EVIDENCE: 2-3 achievements translated to business value. Max 3-4 quantified claims. Mirror JD terms. Frame as deliverables.

P3 — CLOSING: Forward-looking value + active call to action. Address "why industry" positively if pivoting — frame what industry enables, not what academia lacks.


NATIONAL LAB Cover Letter (350-450 words, 4 paragraphs)

P1 — HOOK: Mission alignment + division/group + position. Reference specific programmatic thrust or group's publication. Technical vocabulary OK.

P2 — CURRENT POSITION: Current work with mission framing. Theory-experiment bridge. HPC scale. Collaborative tone.

P3 — PRIOR WORK: Transferable methodology arc. Custom tools → ML infrastructure. International collaboration. Quantify.

P4 — CLOSING: Programmatic vision + collaboration offer + seminar availability. Lab vocabulary: "thrust area," "programmatic direction."


ACADEMIC Cover Letter (350-450 postdoc, 450-650 faculty; 4 paragraphs)

P1 — HOOK: Connection to PI's specific paper + your identity + position. Name the PI.

P2 — CURRENT RESEARCH: Current position with field-context framing (use significance files if available). Future direction: 1-2 sentences MANDATORY.

P3 — PRIOR FOUNDATION: Transferable methodology + collaboration + mentorship. Faculty: departmental fit narrative.

P4 — CLOSING: Forward-looking + name 2-3 faculty for collaboration. Postdoc: "contribute to your research program." Faculty: "build independent research program complementing..."


Universal CL Rules

  • Open with a specific reference to their work — avoid generic openers like "I am writing to express my interest"
  • Add narrative context the CV cannot — motivation, "why this company," research vision
  • Limit quantified claims to 3-5 per CL
  • Credentials woven into body paragraphs, not dumped in closing
  • Active call to action in closing — not passive "Thank you for your consideration"
  • If pivoting domains: lead with methodology in P1, not apologetic framing

Jargon Calibration

  • Industry: Assume HR reads first. Minimize subfield jargon.
  • National Lab / Academic: Domain expert reads. Use field vocabulary.

Package Reading Rules

  • Resume/CV must stand alone — many hiring managers never read the CL
  • CL deepens, not introduces — every major CL claim traceable to a resume/CV bullet
  • No contradictions between documents
  • Resume + CL = 3 pages | CV + CL = 6-7 pages

CL Anti-Patterns

  • No generic opener ("I am writing to express my interest...")
  • No defensive framing ("Despite my background in...")
  • No credential dump in closing paragraph
  • No repeating resume bullets verbatim — CL deepens, doesn't duplicate
  • Limit quantified claims to 3-5 per CL