3.3 KiB
name, description
| name | description |
|---|---|
| setup-extract | Extract source-grounded career evidence from papers, employment records, project documents, and notes into structured knowledge-base files without promoting inference to fact. |
Source Evidence Extraction
Use this skill when adding new evidence to knowledge_base/extractions/. Extraction preserves what a source supports; it does not tailor claims to a vacancy.
Required inputs
- Read
config.mdand the anti-fabrication rules inAGENTS.md. - Read the complete source material.
- Check
resume_builder/canonical/claims.jsonfor existing facts and identifiers. - Inspect related extraction files so new evidence does not create a duplicate or contradiction.
Generated resumes, cover letters, critiques, and session files under output/ are never evidence sources.
Extraction procedure
1. Identify the source
Record:
- source filename and type;
- source date, if known;
- whether it is primary evidence, user-authored notes, or a secondary description;
- the person, employer, project, or publication it concerns.
2. Separate evidence from inference
For every potentially reusable fact, record:
- the source-supported statement;
- the exact supporting passage or precise location;
- any interpretation separately as
Inference; - confidence:
verified,user-confirmed,needs verification, ordo not use.
Never silently convert an inference into a verified claim.
3. Capture career facts precisely
When applicable, extract:
- exact employer, formal title, location, and start/end dates;
- ownership scope and collaborators;
- work performed, method, technology, and domain;
- outcome and beneficiary;
- metrics with units, baseline, period, and attribution;
- publication status, authorship position, and venue;
- current versus historical skill use;
- certification versus practical experience.
For large-company work, describe only the user's component, domain, pipeline, service, or contribution. Do not infer ownership of organization-wide platforms or transformations.
4. Record claim controls
For each major claim, include where useful:
- allowed verbs;
- verbs or framings that would overstate ownership;
- safe resume wording;
- known contradictions requiring resolution;
- whether a metric is verified, qualitative only, or still missing.
5. Write the extraction
Create or update a focused Markdown file in knowledge_base/extractions/. Use a clear structure such as:
# Subject
## Source
## Verified facts
## Ownership and attribution
## Outcomes and metrics
## Skills and recency
## Safe claim seeds
## Inferences / open questions
## Conflicts with existing KB
Claim seeds are factual building blocks, not polished resume bullets. Do not add unsupported impact language for relevance.
Publication rules
- Never infer
published,accepted, orunder reviewfrom a manuscript file. - Preserve the user's author position.
- Institutional funding is not a personal award.
- Follow
config.mdprovenance flags.
Completion
Report:
- files created or updated;
- newly verified facts;
- unresolved contradictions or missing metrics;
- suggested next command: use
setup-build-kbto promote reviewed evidence into the canonical registry, experience files, bundles, and support files.
Do not update canonical claims from an unreviewed extraction.