dennisthiessenandClaude Opus 5
a0ec2fedb5
Scout run 2026-09-04 (36 companies, 778 eligible) plus the NVIDIA package it surfaced, and the tooling and policy fixes found along the way. Application - NVIDIA Senior DevOps Engineer, Zurich (JR2024256): submitted 2026-09-05. Evidence Fit 64/100 Stretch, hard gate FAIL x2, channel Weak. Sent on an explicit user override with the working model unresolved, so hybrid-vs-onsite is a live screening topic. 2pp resume + 1pp cover letter, both validators PASS, 0 boxes, 0 Tier 1 findings open. Policy - Drop the 7 Core / 2 Adjacent / 1 Stretch cohort caps. They had no derivation and were overridden whenever they bound, and the cohort was confounded: it tested fit class while holding channel constant at Weak across all six applications. Keep the recording, drop the rationing. - Channel replaces the slot budget as the rationed variable: no application goes out cold when a named contact is published and reachable. - Propagated through shared_ops, session_file_template, cohort_tracker (counts, never counts-against-a-target) and application_cohort.json. Tool fixes - fetch_workday emitted 404 URLs for every Workday company (NVIDIA, Novartis, Equinor): externalPath is site-relative and needs the locale + site prefix. 6/6 short-form 404, 3/3 long-form 200. 773 dead links repaired across 42 archived reports. - find_decision_url silently de-linked decisions on two boards, which is why ruled-out roles kept resurfacing as undecided. RUAG rotates its UUID on repost; BIS migrated its vacancy URL scheme, orphaning 5 decisions including a live application. Fixed as a two-tier match, not a slug key -- slugs collide (two live RUAG reqs shared one). Knowledge base - claims.json: add Bash / shell scripting, the third canonical gap of this shape after Ansible and Linux administration. - bundle_data_platform: BS-4 was framed as a delivered observability stack over what claims.json calls a proof of concept -- the defect the 2026-08-21 sweep was told to look for. - CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md: correct the RUAG Data Lakehouse shortlist claim, which the JD does not support and which both files still asserted. - resume_template: comment-guard the missing babel/ngerman language block. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QFb8tTCig5r1KzkQiNXcYt
1.8 KiB
1.8 KiB
Session File Template
Every JD gets output/<Folder>/session_<name>.md.
# Session: [Company] — [Role]
## JD Integrity
- File/source:
- Retrieval method and date:
- Verbatim posting: YES/NO
- Posting status:
## Application Decision
- Audience profile: International Tech / Swiss-DACH / Employer-specific
- Evidence Fit: [0-100]
- Fit class: Core / Adjacent / Stretch
- Hard gate: PASS / FAIL — [reason]
- Channel Strength: Strong / Moderate / Weak
- Channel plan: [referral/recruiter/hiring-team/cold]
- Named contact published? YES/NO -- [who, and whether contacted] (no slot quotas; see application_strategy.md)
- Decision: PROCEED / HOLD / NO-GO
## Requirements
| # | Requirement | Required/preferred | Direct/Adjacent/Gap/Constraint | Canonical evidence | Gate? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
## Competitive Read
- Obvious-fit candidate:
- Dennis's advantage:
- Their advantage:
- Level/scope comparison:
## Framing Strategy
- Professional identity:
- Strongest proof points:
- Honest adjacent bridges:
- Explicit gaps:
- User directives:
## Resume Plan
- Summary: omit / 2--3 lines
- Skills: [4--6 evidence-backed lines]
- Swisscom: [4--5 selected canonical IDs]
- Bosch: [3--4 selected canonical IDs]
- Earlier experience: [0--1 per role]
- Total bullets: [normally 11--14; no page-fill quota]
- Impact evidence still needed:
## Cover Letter Decision
- YES/NO:
- Reason:
- Information it adds beyond resume:
- Verified hook sources:
## Output Files
- Resume:
- Cover letter: [path or intentionally omitted]
- Critique:
## Critique Summary
- Evidence Fit:
- Hard gate:
- Document Quality:
- Channel Strength:
- Tier 1 fixes:
## Status
- Fit gate:
- Resume:
- Cover letter:
- Critique:
- Application/outcome:
- Next:
The session file records application state, but it is not evidence authority. Canonical claims remain authoritative.