# Review remediation — 2026-09-11 User authorized all recommendations in `output/Project_Review_2026-09-11/project_review.tex`. Work sequentially; update this file after each verified fix and before stopping. Do not rewrite submitted application archives or invent missing evidence. ## Resume point **All findings F01–F19 are complete.** Remaining known gaps, none of them a finding: the visual page-by-page sampling was not repeated (the F18 work measured page-one geometry from the compiled PDF instead), and the 13 older packages listed below still carry genuine findings under today's rules - deliberately, because F17 classifies archives as evidence rather than rewriting them. Read this file and inspect `git log`/`git diff` before resuming; do not repeat completed work. Checkpoints: `afdef7e` (F01+F02) · `fc5f3e4` (F03–F06) · `ce5b7f5` (F07) · `3519b2f` (F08–F10) · `afd8174` (F11–F13) · `ce8619b` (F14) · `c7e8d4e` (F15–F16) · `eecdbda` (F17) · plus F18–F19. ## User rulings — 2026-09-11 - **Aker BP application date: 2026-07-29** (confirmed; the CLAUDE.md cell saying 07-30 was wrong). - **Aker BP Adjacent-despite-79:** user does not remember and considers it immaterial, role closed and rejected — *"mach wie du es am saubersten findest"*. Resolved as: keep the recorded class, record an honest override reason saying the rationale is unrecoverable, and do **not** reclassify. Silent reclassification was the review's own objection. - **F18/F19 document layout changes: authorized.** ## Checklist | Finding | Status | Scope / verification | |---|---|---| | F01 | DONE | Six shared workflows; both agent entrypoints route identically; parity/link regression test | | F02 | DONE | 26 registry records, preserved original tables, common current view, interview events independent of outcome | | F03 | DONE | Quota gone (tracker is uncapped, `cohort_tracker.py` is a shim); Aker BP date and override recorded; validation enforces unique IDs, ISO dates, score range and gate/class consistency | | F04 | DONE | Three-level rule hierarchy in AGENTS.md + CLAUDE.md; deliverable vs QA separated; `resume_reference.md` Capgemini contradiction removed | | F05 | DONE | Per-claim forbidden wording enforced, identity/employer/placeholder/exclusion checks, `document_exclusions` given a canonical home, PASS no longer claims to be a truth certificate | | F06 | DONE | LaTeX comments, markup, accent macros and umlauts normalized; negations respected; German `und` in the cadence hint; advisory warnings labelled as never a gate | | F07 | DONE | Overstatement narrowed (BS-1, zero-downtime, retrieval, evaluation, PyTorch context); undervaluation fixed (BS-6 reached no bundle at all; Linux/Ansible/Bash missing from taxonomy) | | F08 | DONE | `evidence_schema` + per-claim `evidence` block on all 26; 8 dates recovered from existing text, 18 written `unrecorded` rather than guessed; coverage reported as an advisory hint, never a gate | | F09 | DONE | `12+ years` -> `over ten years` with the reasoning inline; `cv_template.tex` banner-marked as the academic legacy path | | F10 | DONE | US figures renamed `*_orientation_only`; the Bavarian formula runs foreign-INTO-German, so inverting it is not a recognised conversion. German grades stay canonical | | F11 | DONE | Requisition-keyed; same-req locations merge; shared titles warn instead of deleting. **Live run recovered 57 roles (758→815)**, including a second RUAG *Software Engineer C5I* req that was invisible | | F12 | DONE | Whole-word place matching (Bernau no longer reads as Bern); ~25 Swiss towns incl. Thun and Zimmerwald; Danish cities; pan-regional scope no longer beats an explicit onsite/one-country restriction. All 14 review cases correct | | F13 | DONE | Identifying query params kept in the key; read and write paths share `lookup_decision`. **Live run recovered 7 reposted RUAG decisions**, labelled RELATED rather than applied as identical | | F14 | DONE | Buckets renamed to keyword relevance with an explicit 'NOT a fit judgement'; German titles and platform/DevOps vocabulary added. Kdo Cy *ICT-System Engineer (DevSecOps/Platform Automation)* went 0→10; *Senior Dateningenieur* 1→3, level with its English twin | | F15 | DONE | Taleo deadline moved out of `posted` (a closing date was making roles look freshly published); `unit`, `compensation`, `contact` and `date_provenance` carried as fields through to the report and JSON. Named contacts now surface — directly serving the channel rule | | F16 | DONE | Restricted runs write `.only-x.md` and leave the daily report intact; seen-state committed only after the report is on disk, and never by a restricted run; unique temp names for atomic writes | | F17 | DONE | Build sweep 46/48; `package_manifest.py` records per package what a rebuild would really do; 7 unclassified packages registered with a safe default; ` oday` removed from the cover-letter template. Historical packages untouched | | F18 | DONE | Rendered-line budget replaces the source-macro count; `page_metrics.py` measures page-one geometry. Demonstrated on a rebuilt copy of the NVIDIA CV: experience moved **55.4% → 44.0%**, 47 → 39 page-one lines, still 2 pages, 0 boxes, validator PASS | | F19 | DONE | Education entries split (degree on the entry line, institution below) after the RUAG model; grades/thesis kept only where concretely relevant; template carries the rule as a comment | **Sequencing note:** F11–F16 all touch `scout.py`. Fix behaviours in place and keep each finding's diff separately verifiable. **Do not start the ~2400-line file split F16 suggests** mid-remediation — it would destroy the ability to attribute a regression to a specific fix. ## Verification log - Review baseline: 9 existing tests passed; 43/45 LaTeX builds succeeded. See the report for limitations. - F01: moved current workflows into `resume_builder/reference/workflows/`; preserved skill frontmatter and Claude invocation support. `python -m unittest discover -s tests -v`: 10/10 pass. - F01 limitation: external `quick_validate.py` could not start because PyYAML is absent; repository tests validate frontmatter and both routing links. - F02: imported 26 applications from the newer CLAUDE table and seven structured cohort records. Originals preserved in `job_scout/state/history/application_status_before_2026-09-11.json`. - F03: `application_tracker.py summary` runs uncapped and reports "interview reached: 1" for SBB despite the withdrawal — the F02 separation working. Aker BP written through `records.transaction()`, so validation and view regeneration ran; `--check` reports views current. - F04: `resume_reference.md` said "Capgemini/Bundeswehr: include only when directly relevant", contradicting the standing never-include rule. Corrected, and the two rules separated. - F05/F06 verification — **the counter-proof document is the evidence**: - All six counter-proofs from the report are now caught (9 errors on one synthetic document). - `% Never claim Terraform` (a comment) and an honest "no Terraform experience" — English and German — correctly produce **no** finding. - **All six packages built under current rules scan clean: SBB, NVIDIA, RUAG, Kdo Cy, Citadel, Aker BP — 0 errors each.** Four false positives of my own making were found and fixed along the way (title collision across employers, education institution vs employment entry, umlauts, LaTeX accent macros). Each is now a regression test. - 13 older packages DO report findings (Apple 9, Microsoft Principal FDE 8, …). These look like genuine historical violations under today's stricter rules — "petabyte scale", "own the AWS data platform", uncontextualised PyTorch/TensorFlow. **Not fixed: F17 governs historical archives and they must not be silently rewritten.** Feed this list into F17. - `tests/test_document_scanner.py` added: 8 must-fail, 4 must-not-fail, plus a guard that current packages stay clean. Full suite 31/31 pass. - F07: raw history preserved; only selection rules and safe wording changed. The NVIDIA/RUAG "line could not be stopped" phrasing is left in the submitted letters and recorded as an OPEN ITEM in `experience_bosch.md` - plausible, unevidenced, to be confirmed before reuse. - F08: `unrecorded` is deliberately a real value. Failing the build on it would push a future session to invent dates to get a green run. - F10: no stale `final_grade_us_4pt` references remain anywhere in the repo. - F11–F14 validated on a live 37-company run: 815 matches vs 758 the day before, the delta being requisitions the title dedupe had been deleting. Seven employers reported shared-title collisions that are now kept and flagged (Grafana 5, Axpo 6, AWS 3, RUAG 2, …). - F14 note: the score floor on RUAG/SBB/BKW/PostFinance/Kdo Cy was a workaround for missing German vocabulary. The vocabulary is now the fix; the floors can probably be reduced later, but they were left in place to keep this diff attributable. - F15/F16 validated on a live 37-company run: named contacts with phone numbers now appear in report rows, NATO/Taleo closing dates render as Bewerbungsfrist rather than Posted, and `--only=kdocy` wrote `2026-09-11.only-kdocy.md` while leaving the full report untouched. - F16 context: the daily-report clobber is not hypothetical. It happened twice in this session (2026-09-10 and 09-11) and both times the full run had to be repeated by hand. - F17 build sweep RUN this session: 48 sources, 46 built, 2 failed — `Infineon_AI_Engineer` cover letter (font expansion: the font is not scalable) and `cv_template.tex` (unfilled placeholders, expected for the academic legacy template). Overfull boxes: Microsoft ISE 25.33pt, Isovalent 0.88pt. Both are historical; not touched. - F17 findings across 21 application packages: **17 are date-dependent** (` oday` in the cover letter, so a rebuild restamps them), **1 has an incomplete source distribution** (NATO ships no `resume.cls` and only builds because a copy exists elsewhere on this machine), 1 has no PDF. The repo carries **three different `resume.cls` variants** (13/7/1 copies), which is exactly why copying the newest one into NATO would not be a safe repair. - F17 classification: 7 packages were unregistered; added to `historical_revalidate`, with a recorded default that anything unlisted is treated that way. Being recent is not being verified — none was re-read for this. - F18/F19 validated by measurement, not assertion: `page_metrics.py` reproduced the review's own figures (NVIDIA 55.4%, SBB 50.6%, RUAG 50.3%) before any change, which is what makes the after-figure meaningful. The submitted NVIDIA package was NOT modified - the demonstration was built from a copy. - The percentage is a DIAGNOSTIC, not a target. No pixel goal, no forced page-two filling. ## Completion rules DONE requires implementation plus relevant checks. Record partial work and exact next action. Missing factual evidence must remain explicitly unresolved, never silently promoted to verified. Historical packages are preserved; fixes apply to active sources and future generation unless specifically noted.