Initial release — claude-resume-kit v1.0
Complete AI-assisted resume/CV generation framework: - 6 Claude Code skills (setup-extract, setup-build-kb, make-resume, make-cl, edit-resume, critique) - LaTeX templates (resume, CV, cover letter) with .cls class files - 6 reference docs (shared_ops, resume_reference, cl_reference, critical_rules, session_file_template, critique_framework) - Fictional Dr. Jordan Chen examples (extraction, experience, bundle, config, session, JD) - Knowledge base scaffolding and config template - README with setup guide and workflow documentation
This commit is contained in:
Akhil Reddy Peeketi
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Re-critique existing resume/CV output files against a JD
|
||||
user-invocable: true
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# /critique
|
||||
|
||||
**User input:** `$ARGUMENTS`
|
||||
|
||||
Parse `$ARGUMENTS`:
|
||||
- Session file path (e.g., `output/Acme/session_acme_engineer.md`) → read session file, derive .tex paths from Output Files
|
||||
- .tex file path(s) + JD source (existing format) → backward compatible
|
||||
- Session name (e.g., `acme_engineer`) → find session file via derivation
|
||||
|
||||
If no CL .tex provided or found in session file, critique resume/CV alone (Part 7 adjustments noted below).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Safety Rules
|
||||
|
||||
**Accuracy > Relevance > Impact > ATS > Brevity**
|
||||
|
||||
Read `config.md` Provenance Flags. Verify every claim against that table.
|
||||
Check `config.md` KB Corrections Log — do not flag corrected items as errors.
|
||||
Use the email from `config.md` Personal Info — flag if a different email appears in output.
|
||||
FIXED sections (from `config.md` FIXED Sections) are template-locked — do not flag for editing. Flag only VARIABLE sections.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## User Input During Execution
|
||||
|
||||
If the user provides feedback, corrections, or suggestions at any point:
|
||||
1. Acknowledge the input immediately
|
||||
2. If it changes scoring criteria or focus: adjust the critique accordingly
|
||||
3. Never restart — resume from current position
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Startup
|
||||
|
||||
Read `resume_builder/reference/shared_ops.md` — Fresh Session Startup + Session File Derivation.
|
||||
Read `CLAUDE.md` — check Active Sessions and KB Corrections.
|
||||
Read `config.md` — load Provenance Flags, FIXED Sections, email.
|
||||
Find and read the session file for the .tex being critiqued (use derivation protocol from shared_ops.md).
|
||||
|
||||
**Recovery check:**
|
||||
- If CL not DONE in session file → "CL not yet generated. Run `/make-cl` first."
|
||||
- If Critique: CURRENT → "Already critiqued (score X/100). Re-run? Waiting for confirmation."
|
||||
- If Critique: STALE → "Edits made since last critique. Re-critiquing."
|
||||
- If Critique: PENDING → proceed
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Protocol
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Read session file** — specifically note:
|
||||
- **Company Context** → reviewer persona, "why this company"
|
||||
- **Framing Strategy** → intentional reframing decisions (flag only execution inconsistencies, not the strategy itself)
|
||||
- **Cover Letter Plan** → CL structure rationale
|
||||
- **Critique Context** → reviewer persona, competitive landscape, domain vocabulary
|
||||
- If session file lacks Company Context or Critique Context: do 1-2 web searches to fill gaps
|
||||
2. Read `resume_builder/reference/critique_framework.md`
|
||||
3. Read the .tex file(s) — derive paths from session file Output Files, or from `$ARGUMENTS`
|
||||
4. Read the JD (path from `$ARGUMENTS` or session file)
|
||||
5. Read the relevant bundle (`resume_builder/bundles/bundle_[role_type].md` — from session file)
|
||||
6. Run char count:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python3 resume_builder/helpers/char_count.py -f [resume|cv] [file.tex]
|
||||
```
|
||||
7. Compile and visually verify:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
pdflatex -interaction=nonstopmode -output-directory=output/<FolderName> [file.tex]
|
||||
```
|
||||
Use the Read tool to view the compiled PDF — check orphans, page fill, header wrapping.
|
||||
If compile fails: note "COMPILE FAILED — visual checks could not be verified" in Part 8.
|
||||
8. If a prior critique exists (`output/<FolderName>/critique_<name>.md`): read it and note previous score.
|
||||
|
||||
9. **Run the full critique per critique_framework.md. The output MUST contain ALL 8 sections** (even if the framework file has partially compacted, produce every section):
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Domain-Specialist Lens** — 7 elements:
|
||||
(a) Reviewer persona (b) Company context (c) JD vocabulary extraction (d) Domain vocabulary map
|
||||
(e) Gap ranking (fatal/serious/cosmetic) (f) Methodology transfer test (g) Competitive landscape
|
||||
2. **Five-Perspective Read-Through** — ATS, Recruiter (10s), HR (30s), HM (2min), Technical (10min) — each with verdict
|
||||
3. **Eight-Dimension Scoring** — weighted table summing to 100
|
||||
(ATS 15%, Summary 10%, Skills 10%, Bullets 25%, Publications 10%, Narrative 15%, Visual 5%, Credibility 10%)
|
||||
4. **Interview Likelihood** — per-reader probability + ceiling analysis
|
||||
5. **Tiered Improvements** — Tier 1 (>=1pt each), Tier 2 (0.3-0.9), Tier 3 (<0.3)
|
||||
6. **Interview Bridge Points** — 5-7 resume-to-interview talking points
|
||||
7. **Cover Letter Critique** — 6 sub-checks (6A anti-patterns, 6B tailoring, 6C context-specific, 6D ATS, 6E structural, 6F package cohesion)
|
||||
- **If no CL provided:** Skip 6A-6E. Run 6F as resume standalone assessment — evaluate whether the resume earns an interview without a CL. Note: "Cover letter not provided — package cohesion not assessed."
|
||||
8. **Post-Generation Verification** — mechanical + content + structural checklists
|
||||
|
||||
10. Save to `output/<FolderName>/critique_<name>.md`
|
||||
11. **Update session file** — Critique Summary (score, findings, tier 1 fixes), Status → Critique: CURRENT
|
||||
12. **Update memory pointer** with new score
|
||||
|
||||
Progress: "Reading session file for framing context..." / "Running ATS keyword scan — 16/20 match..." / "Scoring 8 dimensions..." / "Score: 87.0/100"
|
||||
|
||||
### >>>>>> MANDATORY STOP <<<<<<
|
||||
Present: score table + tier 1 actionable fixes + interview likelihood.
|
||||
**You MUST wait for the user's explicit text response before continuing.**
|
||||
If edits needed, tell user to run `/edit-resume`.
|
||||
|
||||
### When user approves / says "looks good" / finalizes:
|
||||
Verify all expected files exist in `output/<FolderName>/`:
|
||||
- session file, resume/CV .tex + .pdf, CL .tex + .pdf, critique .md
|
||||
- Compile artifacts (.aux, .log, .out)
|
||||
Confirm to user: "Package complete in output/<FolderName>/ — [list files]"
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user