feat(resume): check bullet cadence variety, warn-only
An audit of all 18 packages in output/ (368 bullets) found one rhythm
running through every document: 45% of bullets used the same "X, Y and
Z" triple, and the SBB package reached 85% - 11 of 13 bullets, every
Swisscom and Bosch line - plus two adjacent bullets both opening
"Build and...".
This is a style finding, not a truth finding. Every bullet was accurate.
The corpus is clean on the axes that actually signal generated text: no
AI vocabulary (0 hits for leverage/spearheaded/robust/passionate and 56
others across 35 documents), prose em-dashes at 0.08/bullet, and PDF
metadata carrying nothing but MiKTeX pdfTeX with empty Author/Title
(0 AI tokens and 0 generator-term leaks across 69 PDFs). What is left is
cadence: ten bullets sharing one three-beat rhythm read as machine-made
even when nothing in them is false.
Guarded deliberately so it cannot do harm. cadence_checks() emits WARN
and never ERROR, the critique deduction caps at 1 point, and both the
reference and the docstring state that no claim, scope or hedged verb
may be bent to satisfy rhythm. An anti-monotony rule with teeth would be
worse than the problem - it would pressure a future run into loosening a
scoped claim to vary a sentence.
Thresholds are calibrated on the corpus, not guessed. Position length
spreads are bimodal (1-9 words, then 15-17), so the check flags a spread
of <=4, the tight tail at ~28% of positions; the first draft used <=6
and flagged the median. Also fixed the opening-verb extractor, which
read \textbf{Owned ...} as the word "textbf" and produced six false
positives on one document. Per-package warnings now run 0-3.
Docs: resume_reference.md 7a + verification step, critical_rules.md 7a,
critique_framework.md mechanics row, CLAUDE.md corrections log.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MHtzyTKBcg6BWhD5qFegtK
This commit is contained in:
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Score the candidate-role pairing before reading tailored prose.
|
||||
| Bullet evidence and impact | 20 | Are bullets specific and scoped without invention? |
|
||||
| Relevance and terminology | 15 | Does it cover the JD naturally? |
|
||||
| Skills evidence | 10 | Is every skill evidence-backed and interview-ready? |
|
||||
| Mechanics/readability | 10 | Does it compile, parse and read cleanly? |
|
||||
| Mechanics/readability | 10 | Does it compile, parse and read cleanly? Includes **cadence variety** — read the bullets in sequence and count "X, Y and Z" triples, repeated opening verbs and length clustering per position (`resume_reference.md` §7a). Deduct at most 1 pt; it is a style flaw, never a truth flaw. |
|
||||
|
||||
Truth/provenance below 8/10 is an automatic document failure.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user